<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(24)</volume><submitter>Izquierdo CP</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies. Caplacizumab is approved for adults with an acute episode of iTTP in conjunction with plasma exchange (PEX) and immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the safety and efficacy of caplacizumab vs the standard of care and assess the effect of the concomitant use of rituximab. A retrospective study from the Spanish TTP Registry of patients treated with caplacizumab vs those who did not receive it was conducted. A total of 155 patients with iTTP (77 caplacizumab, 78 no caplacizumab) were included. Patients initially treated with caplacizumab had fewer exacerbations (4.5% vs 20.5%; P &lt; .05) and less refractoriness (4.5% vs 14.1%; P &lt; .05) than t</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood advances</journal><pagination>6219-6227</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9792393</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Real-world effectiveness of caplacizumab vs the standard of care in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9792393</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Garcia I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Avila Idrovo LF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez GM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Izquierdo CP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tallon I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Varea S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreno Beltran ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mingot-Castellano ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atucha JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salinas R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Rubia J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sole M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Del Rio-Garma J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hernandez L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martin P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valcarcel D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campuzano V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perez-Montana A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hernandez Castellet JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paciello ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zalba S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Arroba Peinado J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Candel F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cid J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Estevez JV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vara M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gala JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Freiria C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez Lorenzo JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lavilla E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cruz N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zarzoso MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arias EG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Munoz N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Segui I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuentes AEK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goterris R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreno Macias JR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Real-world effectiveness of caplacizumab vs the standard of care in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.</name><description>Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies. Caplacizumab is approved for adults with an acute episode of iTTP in conjunction with plasma exchange (PEX) and immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the safety and efficacy of caplacizumab vs the standard of care and assess the effect of the concomitant use of rituximab. A retrospective study from the Spanish TTP Registry of patients treated with caplacizumab vs those who did not receive it was conducted. A total of 155 patients with iTTP (77 caplacizumab, 78 no caplacizumab) were included. Patients initially treated with caplacizumab had fewer exacerbations (4.5% vs 20.5%; P &lt; .05) and less refractoriness (4.5% vs 14.1%; P &lt; .05) than t</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:10:10.878Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:10:10.878Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9792393</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35930694</pubmed><doi>10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008028</doi></cross_references></HashMap>