{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["24(10)"],"submitter":["Tripartite Gastrointestinal Recovery SBO Group"],"pubmed_abstract":["Aim
Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency condition. Research in the field is plentiful; however, inconsistency in outcome reporting makes comparisons challenging. The aim of this study was to define a core outcome set (COS) for studies of ASBO.Methods
The long list of outcomes was identified through systematic review, and focus groups across different geographical regions. A modified Delphi consensus exercise of three rounds was undertaken with stakeholder groups (patients and clinicians). Items were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Items exceeding 70% rating at 7-9 were passed to the consensus meeting. New item proposals were invited in round 1. Individualised feedback on prior voting compared to other participants was provided. An interna"],"journal":["Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland"],"pagination":["1204-1210"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9796004"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["A core outcome set for clinical studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction."],"pmcid":["PMC9796004"],"pubmed_authors":["Siragusa L","Sayers AE","Drake TM","Ananth S","Beamish A","Peckham-Cooper A","Mellor K","Pockney P","Thompson J","Williams A","Duff S","Lam YH","McDermott F","Naylor M","Keane C","Fakhrul-Aldeen M","Parnell R","Blencowe NS","Smart NJ","Thorpe G","Daniels S","McVeigh J","Chan S","Culkin A","Bagaglini G","Blackwell S","Hind D","Tripartite Gastrointestinal Recovery SBO Group","Forshaw S","Vaughan-Shaw PG","Gani J","O'Grady G","Tutty L","Fleetwood-Beresford S","Mehraj A","Wheelband KR","Dudi-Venkata NN","Fisher N","Chisholm L","Lynch A","Rutegard M","Delaney CP","Younis MU","Ten Broek RPG","Coe PO","Drayton DJ","Bibby N","Carver J","Evans MD","Love L","Arnott R","Lee MJ","Bulte JP","Moug S","Jayne DG","Clerc D","Haddon S","Vissapragada R","Vinci D","Millan M","Chapman SJ","Helliwell J","Herrod P","Hollyman M","Juloski J","Maw A","Proctor VK","Major G","Challand CP","Wolthuis AM","Swain D","Fish R","Hopkins J","Dawson A","Dawidziuk A","Saha A","Rajagopalan A","Robinson J","Fearnhead NS","Mohan H","Wells CI","Brown LR","Sammour T","Espin-Basany E","Cox D","Pata F","Mishra A","Adegbola S","Han J","Pellino G","Sahnan K"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A core outcome set for clinical studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction.","description":"Aim
Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency condition. Research in the field is plentiful; however, inconsistency in outcome reporting makes comparisons challenging. The aim of this study was to define a core outcome set (COS) for studies of ASBO.Methods
The long list of outcomes was identified through systematic review, and focus groups across different geographical regions. A modified Delphi consensus exercise of three rounds was undertaken with stakeholder groups (patients and clinicians). Items were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Items exceeding 70% rating at 7-9 were passed to the consensus meeting. New item proposals were invited in round 1. Individualised feedback on prior voting compared to other participants was provided. An interna","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Oct","modification":"2025-04-04T03:10:45.037Z","creation":"2025-04-04T03:10:45.037Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9796004","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35445534"],"doi":["10.1111/codi.16158"]}}