<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(10)</volume><submitter>Tripartite Gastrointestinal Recovery SBO Group</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency condition. Research in the field is plentiful; however, inconsistency in outcome reporting makes comparisons challenging. The aim of this study was to define a core outcome set (COS) for studies of ASBO.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The long list of outcomes was identified through systematic review, and focus groups across different geographical regions. A modified Delphi consensus exercise of three rounds was undertaken with stakeholder groups (patients and clinicians). Items were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Items exceeding 70% rating at 7-9 were passed to the consensus meeting. New item proposals were invited in round 1. Individualised feedback on prior voting compared to other participants was provided. An interna</pubmed_abstract><journal>Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</journal><pagination>1204-1210</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9796004</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A core outcome set for clinical studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9796004</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Siragusa L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sayers AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drake TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ananth S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beamish A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peckham-Cooper A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mellor K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pockney P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duff S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lam YH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDermott F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Naylor M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keane C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fakhrul-Aldeen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Parnell R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blencowe NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smart NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thorpe G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daniels S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McVeigh J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Culkin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bagaglini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blackwell S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hind D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tripartite Gastrointestinal Recovery SBO Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Forshaw S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vaughan-Shaw PG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gani J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Grady G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tutty L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fleetwood-Beresford S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mehraj A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wheelband KR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dudi-Venkata NN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fisher N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chisholm L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lynch A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutegard M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delaney CP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Younis MU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ten Broek RPG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coe PO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Drayton DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bibby N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carver J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Evans MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Love L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Arnott R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bulte JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moug S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jayne DG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clerc D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haddon S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vissapragada R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vinci D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Millan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chapman SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Helliwell J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herrod P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hollyman M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Juloski J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maw A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Proctor VK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Major G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Challand CP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolthuis AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swain D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fish R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hopkins J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dawidziuk A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saha A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rajagopalan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robinson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fearnhead NS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohan H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wells CI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown LR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sammour T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Espin-Basany E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cox D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pata F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mishra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adegbola S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pellino G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sahnan K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A core outcome set for clinical studies of adhesive small bowel obstruction.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common surgical emergency condition. Research in the field is plentiful; however, inconsistency in outcome reporting makes comparisons challenging. The aim of this study was to define a core outcome set (COS) for studies of ASBO.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The long list of outcomes was identified through systematic review, and focus groups across different geographical regions. A modified Delphi consensus exercise of three rounds was undertaken with stakeholder groups (patients and clinicians). Items were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Items exceeding 70% rating at 7-9 were passed to the consensus meeting. New item proposals were invited in round 1. Individualised feedback on prior voting compared to other participants was provided. An interna</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-04T03:10:45.037Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T03:10:45.037Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9796004</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35445534</pubmed><doi>10.1111/codi.16158</doi></cross_references></HashMap>