<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(11)</volume><submitter>Sharabiany S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>The aim of this systematic review was to analyse recurrence rates after different surgical techniques for perineal hernia repair.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>All original studies (n ≥ 2 patients) reporting recurrence rates after perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection (APR) were included. The electronic database PubMed was last searched in December 2021. The primary outcome was recurrent perineal hernia. A weighted average of the logit proportions was determined by the use of the generic inverse variance method and random effects model.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 19 studies involving 172 patients were included. The mean age of patients was 64 ± 5.6 years and the indication for APR was predominantly cancer (99%, 170/172). The pooled percentage of recurrent perineal hernia was 3</pubmed_abstract><journal>Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</journal><pagination>1285-1294</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9796945</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Mesh, flap or combined repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection - A systematic review and meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9796945</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Brouwer TPA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharabiany S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kreisel SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blok RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hompes R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Musters GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanis PJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Mesh, flap or combined repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection - A systematic review and meta-analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>The aim of this systematic review was to analyse recurrence rates after different surgical techniques for perineal hernia repair.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>All original studies (n ≥ 2 patients) reporting recurrence rates after perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection (APR) were included. The electronic database PubMed was last searched in December 2021. The primary outcome was recurrent perineal hernia. A weighted average of the logit proportions was determined by the use of the generic inverse variance method and random effects model.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 19 studies involving 172 patients were included. The mean age of patients was 64 ± 5.6 years and the indication for APR was predominantly cancer (99%, 170/172). The pooled percentage of recurrent perineal hernia was 3</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:58:53.908Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T10:58:53.908Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9796945</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35712806</pubmed><doi>10.1111/codi.16224</doi></cross_references></HashMap>