<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(1)</volume><submitter>Behar Harpaz S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>A national, lung cancer screening programme is under consideration in Australia, and we assessed cost-effectiveness using updated data and assumptions.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We estimated the cost-effectiveness of lung screening by applying screening parameters and outcomes from either the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) or the NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) to Australian data on lung cancer risk, mortality, health-system costs, and smoking trends using a deterministic, multi-cohort model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for a lifetime horizon.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ICER for lung screening compared to usual care in the NELSON-based scenario was AU$39,250 (95% CI $18,150-108,300) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY); l</pubmed_abstract><journal>British journal of cancer</journal><pagination>91-101</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9814515</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening for Australia, capturing differences in the health economic impact of NELSON and NLST outcomes.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9814515</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Weber MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Canfell K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wade S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Behar Harpaz S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zalcberg JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fong K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marshall H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tammemagi MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caruana M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cressman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vaneckova P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McWilliams A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngo PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarich PEA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening for Australia, capturing differences in the health economic impact of NELSON and NLST outcomes.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>A national, lung cancer screening programme is under consideration in Australia, and we assessed cost-effectiveness using updated data and assumptions.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We estimated the cost-effectiveness of lung screening by applying screening parameters and outcomes from either the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) or the NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) to Australian data on lung cancer risk, mortality, health-system costs, and smoking trends using a deterministic, multi-cohort model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for a lifetime horizon.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ICER for lung screening compared to usual care in the NELSON-based scenario was AU$39,250 (95% CI $18,150-108,300) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY); l</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:37:45.183Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:37:45.183Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9814515</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36323879</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41416-022-02026-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>