<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Fisher JA</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><pagination>222-227</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9815482</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The increasing availability of portable air pollution monitoring devices has greatly enhanced the ability to measure personal exposures in real time. However, these devices vary considerably in their cost and specifications, and questions remain as to their reliability and practicality for use in epidemiological investigations. In this field study, three personal PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> exposure monitors (two nephelometers, one optical particle counter) were compared in an urban setting to assess their feasibility for use in future studies. In total, 3963 1-min measurements were collected over 12 days from locations of several types (e.g., above and below-ground subway stations, sidewalks next to urban traffic, outdoor construction sites) in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Overall, we obs</pubmed_abstract><journal>Environmental science &amp; technology letters</journal><pubmed_title>Sources of Variability in Real-time Monitoring Data for Fine Particulate Matter: Comparability of Three Wearable Monitors in an Urban Setting.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9815482</pmcid><funding_grant_id>Z99 CA999999</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kim S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong JYY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Locke SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Albert PS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fisher JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Friesen MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kefelegn Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Sources of Variability in Real-time Monitoring Data for Fine Particulate Matter: Comparability of Three Wearable Monitors in an Urban Setting.</name><description>The increasing availability of portable air pollution monitoring devices has greatly enhanced the ability to measure personal exposures in real time. However, these devices vary considerably in their cost and specifications, and questions remain as to their reliability and practicality for use in epidemiological investigations. In this field study, three personal PM&lt;sub>2.5&lt;/sub> exposure monitors (two nephelometers, one optical particle counter) were compared in an urban setting to assess their feasibility for use in future studies. In total, 3963 1-min measurements were collected over 12 days from locations of several types (e.g., above and below-ground subway stations, sidewalks next to urban traffic, outdoor construction sites) in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Overall, we obs</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T12:37:42.708Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T12:37:42.708Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9815482</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36618715</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00115</doi></cross_references></HashMap>