<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>93(39)</volume><submitter>Moorthy AS</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Deciding whether the mass spectra of seized drug evidence and a reference standard are measurements of two different compounds is a central challenge in forensic chemistry. Normally, an analyst will collect mass spectra from the sample and a reference standard under identical conditions, compute a mass spectral similarity score, and make a judgment about the sample using both the similarity score and their visual interpretation of the spectra. This approach is inherently subjective and not ideal when a rapid assessment of several samples is necessary. Making decisions using only the score and a threshold value greatly improves analysis throughput and removes analyst-to-analyst subjectivity, but selecting an appropriate threshold is itself a nontrivial task. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the min-max test-a simple and objective method for classifying mass spectra that leverages replicate measurements from each sample to remove analyst subjectivity. We demonstrate that the min-max test has an intuitive interpretation for decision-making, and its performance exceeds thresholding with similarity scores even when the best performing threshold for a fixed dataset is prescribed. Determining whether the underlying framework of the min-max test can incorporate retention indices for objectively deciding whether spectra are measurements of the same compound is an ongoing work.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Analytical chemistry</journal><pagination>13319-13325</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9817079</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Min-Max Test: An Objective Method for Discriminating Mass Spectra.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9817079</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sisco E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moorthy AS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Min-Max Test: An Objective Method for Discriminating Mass Spectra.</name><description>Deciding whether the mass spectra of seized drug evidence and a reference standard are measurements of two different compounds is a central challenge in forensic chemistry. Normally, an analyst will collect mass spectra from the sample and a reference standard under identical conditions, compute a mass spectral similarity score, and make a judgment about the sample using both the similarity score and their visual interpretation of the spectra. This approach is inherently subjective and not ideal when a rapid assessment of several samples is necessary. Making decisions using only the score and a threshold value greatly improves analysis throughput and removes analyst-to-analyst subjectivity, but selecting an appropriate threshold is itself a nontrivial task. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the min-max test-a simple and objective method for classifying mass spectra that leverages replicate measurements from each sample to remove analyst subjectivity. We demonstrate that the min-max test has an intuitive interpretation for decision-making, and its performance exceeds thresholding with similarity scores even when the best performing threshold for a fixed dataset is prescribed. Determining whether the underlying framework of the min-max test can incorporate retention indices for objectively deciding whether spectra are measurements of the same compound is an ongoing work.</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-21T16:18:40.722Z</modification><creation>2025-04-21T16:18:40.722Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9817079</accession><cross_references><pubmed>34555282</pubmed><doi>10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03053</doi></cross_references></HashMap>