{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["50(1)"],"submitter":["Gaskell C"],"pubmed_abstract":["This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapies across inpatient, outpatient and University-based clinics. This was a pre-registered systematic-review of studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria (CRD42020175235). Eligible studies were searched in three databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. Pre-post treatment (uncontrolled) effect sizes were calculated and pooled using random effects meta-analysis to generate effectiveness benchmarks. Moderator analyses were used to examine sources of heterogeneity in effect sizes. Overall, 252 studies (k = 298 samples) were identified, of which 223 (k = 263 samples) provided sufficient data for inclusion in meta-analysis. Results showed large pre-post treatment effects for depression [d = 0.96, (CI 0.88-1.04), p ≤ 0.001, k = 122], anxiety [d = 0.8 (CI 0.71-0.9), p ≤ 0.001, k = 69], and other outcomes [d = 1.01 (CI 0.93-1.09), p ≤ 0.001, k = 158]. This review provides support for the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapy. Effectiveness benchmarks are supplied to support service evaluations across multiple settings."],"journal":["Administration and policy in mental health"],"pagination":["43-57"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9832112"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC9832112"],"pubmed_authors":["Rogerson E","Somerville E","Gaskell C","Simmonds-Buckley M","Stockton C","Kellett S","Delgadillo J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","description":"This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapies across inpatient, outpatient and University-based clinics. This was a pre-registered systematic-review of studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria (CRD42020175235). Eligible studies were searched in three databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. Pre-post treatment (uncontrolled) effect sizes were calculated and pooled using random effects meta-analysis to generate effectiveness benchmarks. Moderator analyses were used to examine sources of heterogeneity in effect sizes. Overall, 252 studies (k = 298 samples) were identified, of which 223 (k = 263 samples) provided sufficient data for inclusion in meta-analysis. Results showed large pre-post treatment effects for depression [d = 0.96, (CI 0.88-1.04), p ≤ 0.001, k = 122], anxiety [d = 0.8 (CI 0.71-0.9), p ≤ 0.001, k = 69], and other outcomes [d = 1.01 (CI 0.93-1.09), p ≤ 0.001, k = 158]. This review provides support for the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapy. Effectiveness benchmarks are supplied to support service evaluations across multiple settings.","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Jan","modification":"2026-03-17T15:43:11.834Z","creation":"2025-04-19T23:07:53.338Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9832112","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36201113"],"doi":["10.1007/s10488-022-01225-y"]}}