<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Costa KM</submitter><funding>U.S. Department of Health &amp;amp; Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)</funding><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><funding>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding><funding>Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung</funding><funding>U.S. Department of Health &amp;amp; Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse</funding><pagination>107-115</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9839657</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>We use mental models of the world-cognitive maps-to guide behavior. The lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) is typically thought to support behavior by deploying these maps to simulate outcomes, but recent evidence suggests that it may instead support behavior by underlying map creation. We tested between these two alternatives using outcome-specific devaluation and a high-potency chemogenetic approach. Selectively inactivating lOFC principal neurons when male rats learned distinct cue-outcome associations, but before outcome devaluation, disrupted subsequent inference, confirming a role for the lOFC in creating new maps. However, lOFC inactivation surprisingly led to generalized devaluation, a result that is inconsistent with a complete mapping failure. Using a reinforcement learning framework, we show that this effect is best explained by a circumscribed deficit in credit assignment precision during map construction, suggesting that the lOFC has a selective role in defining the specificity of associations that comprise cognitive maps.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature neuroscience</journal><pubmed_title>The role of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in creating cognitive maps.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9839657</pmcid><funding_grant_id>da000587</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZIA DA000587</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MA 8509</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>none</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Costa KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scholz R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoenbaum G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gardner MPH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moreno-Castilla P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lloyd K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dayan P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The role of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in creating cognitive maps.</name><description>We use mental models of the world-cognitive maps-to guide behavior. The lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) is typically thought to support behavior by deploying these maps to simulate outcomes, but recent evidence suggests that it may instead support behavior by underlying map creation. We tested between these two alternatives using outcome-specific devaluation and a high-potency chemogenetic approach. Selectively inactivating lOFC principal neurons when male rats learned distinct cue-outcome associations, but before outcome devaluation, disrupted subsequent inference, confirming a role for the lOFC in creating new maps. However, lOFC inactivation surprisingly led to generalized devaluation, a result that is inconsistent with a complete mapping failure. Using a reinforcement learning framework, we show that this effect is best explained by a circumscribed deficit in credit assignment precision during map construction, suggesting that the lOFC has a selective role in defining the specificity of associations that comprise cognitive maps.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2024-11-20T05:35:54.69Z</modification><creation>2024-11-20T05:35:54.69Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9839657</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36550290</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41593-022-01216-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>