<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Yang L</submitter><funding>Center for Individualized Medicine at Mayo Clinic</funding><funding>NHGRI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>bbac607</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9851339</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Differential abundance analysis (DAA) is one central statistical task in microbiome data analysis. A robust and powerful DAA tool can help identify highly confident microbial candidates for further biological validation. Current microbiome studies frequently generate correlated samples from different microbiome sampling schemes such as spatial and temporal sampling. In the past decade, a number of DAA tools for correlated microbiome data (DAA-c) have been proposed. Disturbingly, different DAA-c tools could sometimes produce quite discordant results. To recommend the best practice to the field, we performed the first comprehensive evaluation of existing DAA-c tools using real data-based simulations. Overall, the linear model-based methods LinDA, MaAsLin2 and LDM are more robust than methods</pubmed_abstract><journal>Briefings in bioinformatics</journal><pubmed_title>Benchmarking differential abundance analysis methods for correlated microbiome sequencing data.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9851339</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 GM144351</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DMS 2113360</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 HG011662</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Yang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Benchmarking differential abundance analysis methods for correlated microbiome sequencing data.</name><description>Differential abundance analysis (DAA) is one central statistical task in microbiome data analysis. A robust and powerful DAA tool can help identify highly confident microbial candidates for further biological validation. Current microbiome studies frequently generate correlated samples from different microbiome sampling schemes such as spatial and temporal sampling. In the past decade, a number of DAA tools for correlated microbiome data (DAA-c) have been proposed. Disturbingly, different DAA-c tools could sometimes produce quite discordant results. To recommend the best practice to the field, we performed the first comprehensive evaluation of existing DAA-c tools using real data-based simulations. Overall, the linear model-based methods LinDA, MaAsLin2 and LDM are more robust than methods</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2026-04-28T03:14:09.347Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T21:55:06.424Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9851339</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36617187</pubmed><doi>10.1093/bib/bbac607</doi></cross_references></HashMap>