<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9</volume><submitter>Zhang L</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The lateral intersecting margin (dog-ear) was a weak spot of the double stapled technique (DST), We designed "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis (DAIA), which could eliminate the "dog-ear" in laparoscopic anterior resection.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>A total of 202 patients underwent elective curative LLAR + DST (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 143) or LLAR + DAIA (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 59) were enrolled in the study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the adverse effects. The clinical data between LLAR + DST and LLAR + DAIA was compared, and the effect of factors on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After PSM, 53 pairs of the LLRA + DST and LLRA + DAIA patients were enrolled in the study. The LLRA + DAIA group has a higher level (3.50 ± 1.03 vs. 2.87 ± 1.10, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.01) of the anastomosis than that of the LLRA + DST group. Patients in LLAR + DAIA group have a lower incidence of protecting loop ileostomy compared to LLAR + DST group (20.75% vs. 5.66%, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05). The LLRA + DAIA patients presented better rates of LARS compare to LLRA + DST patients at 6 months (major LARS 37.74% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 20) vs. 67.93% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 36); &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.007) and 12 months (major LARS 13.21% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 7) vs. 20.37% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 11); &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.03) after surgery. The OS and DFS rates were similar (&lt;i>P&lt;/i> > 0.05).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique are well-established procedures for patients with low rectal cancer. "Dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique may reduce the incidence of protecting loop ileostomy and significantly affect LARS score, and demonstrate a positive impact on the quality of life after surgery.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in surgery</journal><pagination>1038873</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9852756</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog ear" invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9852756</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Lv X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gong L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog ear" invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The lateral intersecting margin (dog-ear) was a weak spot of the double stapled technique (DST), We designed "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis (DAIA), which could eliminate the "dog-ear" in laparoscopic anterior resection.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>A total of 202 patients underwent elective curative LLAR + DST (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 143) or LLAR + DAIA (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 59) were enrolled in the study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the adverse effects. The clinical data between LLAR + DST and LLAR + DAIA was compared, and the effect of factors on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After PSM, 53 pairs of the LLRA + DST and LLRA + DAIA patients were enrolled in the study. The LLRA + DAIA group has a higher level (3.50 ± 1.03 vs. 2.87 ± 1.10, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.01) of the anastomosis than that of the LLRA + DST group. Patients in LLAR + DAIA group have a lower incidence of protecting loop ileostomy compared to LLAR + DST group (20.75% vs. 5.66%, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> &lt; 0.05). The LLRA + DAIA patients presented better rates of LARS compare to LLRA + DST patients at 6 months (major LARS 37.74% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 20) vs. 67.93% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 36); &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.007) and 12 months (major LARS 13.21% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 7) vs. 20.37% (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 11); &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.03) after surgery. The OS and DFS rates were similar (&lt;i>P&lt;/i> > 0.05).&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic low anterior resection with "dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique are well-established procedures for patients with low rectal cancer. "Dog-ear" invagination anastomosis technique may reduce the incidence of protecting loop ileostomy and significantly affect LARS score, and demonstrate a positive impact on the quality of life after surgery.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022</publication><modification>2025-04-22T01:07:41.676Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:49:45.198Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9852756</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36684252</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fsurg.2022.1038873</doi></cross_references></HashMap>