<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10</volume><submitter>van der Meijden SL</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support (AI-CDS) tools have great potential to benefit intensive care unit (ICU) patients and physicians. There is a gap between the development and implementation of these tools.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to investigate physicians' perspectives and their current decision-making behavior before implementing a discharge AI-CDS tool for predicting readmission and mortality risk after ICU discharge.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a survey of physicians involved in decision-making on discharge of patients at two Dutch academic ICUs between July and November 2021. Questions were divided into four domains: (1) physicians' current decision-making behavior with respect to discharging ICU patients, (2) perspectives on the use of AI-CDS tools in general, (3) willingness to incorporate a discharge AI-CDS tool into daily clinical practice, and (4) preferences for using a discharge AI-CDS tool in daily workflows.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Most of the 64 respondents (of 93 contacted, 69%) were familiar with AI (62/64, 97%) and had positive expectations of AI, with 55 of 64 (86%) believing that AI could support them in their work as a physician. The respondents disagreed on whether the decision to discharge a patient was complex (23/64, 36% agreed and 22/64, 34% disagreed); nonetheless, most (59/64, 92%) agreed that a discharge AI-CDS tool could be of value. Significant differences were observed between physicians from the 2 academic sites, which may be related to different levels of involvement in the development of the discharge AI-CDS tool.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>ICU physicians showed a favorable attitude toward the integration of AI-CDS tools into the ICU setting in general, and in particular toward a tool to predict a patient's risk of readmission and mortality within 7 days after discharge. The findings of this questionnaire will be used to improve the implementation process and training of end users.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JMIR human factors</journal><pagination>e39114</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9853335</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9853335</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Arbous MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Meijden SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kant IMJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steyerberg EW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thoral PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Hond AAH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cina G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support (AI-CDS) tools have great potential to benefit intensive care unit (ICU) patients and physicians. There is a gap between the development and implementation of these tools.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We aimed to investigate physicians' perspectives and their current decision-making behavior before implementing a discharge AI-CDS tool for predicting readmission and mortality risk after ICU discharge.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a survey of physicians involved in decision-making on discharge of patients at two Dutch academic ICUs between July and November 2021. Questions were divided into four domains: (1) physicians' current decision-making behavior with respect to discharging ICU patients, (2) perspectives on the use of AI-CDS tools in general, (3) willingness to incorporate a discharge AI-CDS tool into daily clinical practice, and (4) preferences for using a discharge AI-CDS tool in daily workflows.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Most of the 64 respondents (of 93 contacted, 69%) were familiar with AI (62/64, 97%) and had positive expectations of AI, with 55 of 64 (86%) believing that AI could support them in their work as a physician. The respondents disagreed on whether the decision to discharge a patient was complex (23/64, 36% agreed and 22/64, 34% disagreed); nonetheless, most (59/64, 92%) agreed that a discharge AI-CDS tool could be of value. Significant differences were observed between physicians from the 2 academic sites, which may be related to different levels of involvement in the development of the discharge AI-CDS tool.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>ICU physicians showed a favorable attitude toward the integration of AI-CDS tools into the ICU setting in general, and in particular toward a tool to predict a patient's risk of readmission and mortality within 7 days after discharge. The findings of this questionnaire will be used to improve the implementation process and training of end users.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-26T14:55:56.153Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T14:44:08.597Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9853335</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36602843</pubmed><doi>10.2196/39114</doi></cross_references></HashMap>