<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(12)</volume><submitter>Vrede SW</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patients with low-grade (ie, grade 1-2) endometrial cancer (EC) are characterized by their favorable prognosis compared with patients with high-grade (ie, grade 3) EC. With the implementation of molecular profiling, the prognostic relevance of tumor grading might lose attention. As most patients present with low-grade EC and have an excellent outcome, the value of molecular profiling for these patients is unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine the association of molecular profiling with outcomes among patients with low-grade EC.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This retrospective cohort study included a multicenter international European cohort of patients diagnosed with EC between 1994 and 2018, with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. Molecular subgroups were determined by next-generation sequencing using single-molecule molecular inversion probes and by immunohistochemistry. Subsequently, tumors were classified as polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered, microsatellite instable (MSI), tumor protein p53 (TP53)-altered, or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Patients diagnosed with any histological subtypes and FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages of EC were included, but patients with early-stage EC (FIGO I-II) were only included if they had known lymph node status. Data were analyzed February 20 to June 16, 2022.&lt;h4>Exposures&lt;/h4>Molecular testing of the 4 molecular subgroups.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>The main outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) within the molecular subgroups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 393 patients with EC were included, with a median (range) age of 64.0 (31.0-86.0) years and median (range) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 29.1 (18.0-58.3). Most patients presented with early-stage (290 patients [73.8%]) and low-grade (209 patients [53.2%]) disease. Of all patients, 33 (8.4%) had POLE-altered EC, 78 (19.8%) had MSI EC, 72 (18.3%) had TP53-altered EC, and 210 (53.4%) had NSMP EC. Across all molecular subgroups, patients with low-grade EC had superior 5-year DSS compared with those with high-grade EC, varying between 90% to 100% vs 41% to 90% (P &lt; .001). Multivariable analysis in the entire cohort including age, tumor grade, FIGO stage, lymphovascular space invasion, and the molecular subgroups as covariates found that only high-grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.29; 95% CI, 2.15-8.53; P &lt; .001), TP53-altered (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.95; P = .03), and FIGO stage III or IV (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.50-7.26; P &lt; .001) disease were independently associated with reduced DSS.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>This cohort study found that patients with low-grade EC had an excellent prognosis independent of molecular subgroup. These findings do not support routine molecular profiling in patients with low-grade EC, and they demonstrate the importance of primary diagnostic tumor grading and selective profiling in low-grade EC to increase cost-effectiveness.</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA network open</journal><pagination>e2247372</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9856566</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Relevance of Molecular Profiling in Patients With Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9856566</pmcid><pubmed_authors>van der Putten LJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weinberger V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kasius J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sweegers S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Snijders MPLM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Weelden WJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reijnen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bulten J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kruitwagen R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vos MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Altena AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pijnenborg JMA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vrede SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asberger J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gil-Moreno A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matias-Guiu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kusters-Vandevelde HVN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Visser NCM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teerenstra S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huvila J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colas E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amant F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boll D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Relevance of Molecular Profiling in Patients With Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Patients with low-grade (ie, grade 1-2) endometrial cancer (EC) are characterized by their favorable prognosis compared with patients with high-grade (ie, grade 3) EC. With the implementation of molecular profiling, the prognostic relevance of tumor grading might lose attention. As most patients present with low-grade EC and have an excellent outcome, the value of molecular profiling for these patients is unclear.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To determine the association of molecular profiling with outcomes among patients with low-grade EC.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>This retrospective cohort study included a multicenter international European cohort of patients diagnosed with EC between 1994 and 2018, with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. Molecular subgroups were determined by next-generation sequencing using single-molecule molecular inversion probes and by immunohistochemistry. Subsequently, tumors were classified as polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered, microsatellite instable (MSI), tumor protein p53 (TP53)-altered, or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Patients diagnosed with any histological subtypes and FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages of EC were included, but patients with early-stage EC (FIGO I-II) were only included if they had known lymph node status. Data were analyzed February 20 to June 16, 2022.&lt;h4>Exposures&lt;/h4>Molecular testing of the 4 molecular subgroups.&lt;h4>Main outcomes and measures&lt;/h4>The main outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) within the molecular subgroups.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 393 patients with EC were included, with a median (range) age of 64.0 (31.0-86.0) years and median (range) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 29.1 (18.0-58.3). Most patients presented with early-stage (290 patients [73.8%]) and low-grade (209 patients [53.2%]) disease. Of all patients, 33 (8.4%) had POLE-altered EC, 78 (19.8%) had MSI EC, 72 (18.3%) had TP53-altered EC, and 210 (53.4%) had NSMP EC. Across all molecular subgroups, patients with low-grade EC had superior 5-year DSS compared with those with high-grade EC, varying between 90% to 100% vs 41% to 90% (P &lt; .001). Multivariable analysis in the entire cohort including age, tumor grade, FIGO stage, lymphovascular space invasion, and the molecular subgroups as covariates found that only high-grade (hazard ratio [HR], 4.29; 95% CI, 2.15-8.53; P &lt; .001), TP53-altered (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.95; P = .03), and FIGO stage III or IV (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.50-7.26; P &lt; .001) disease were independently associated with reduced DSS.&lt;h4>Conclusions and relevance&lt;/h4>This cohort study found that patients with low-grade EC had an excellent prognosis independent of molecular subgroup. These findings do not support routine molecular profiling in patients with low-grade EC, and they demonstrate the importance of primary diagnostic tumor grading and selective profiling in low-grade EC to increase cost-effectiveness.</description><dates><release>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2022 Dec</publication><modification>2026-05-27T11:05:26.211Z</modification><creation>2025-02-19T00:13:34.294Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9856566</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36525269</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47372</doi></cross_references></HashMap>