<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhong S</submitter><funding>JingLI</funding><pagination>374</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9857641</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Red-flowered oil-tea camellia (&lt;i>ROC&lt;/i>) is an important woody oil species growing in the south, and its oil has high nutritional value. There are four main species of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> in China, namely, &lt;i>Camellia chekiangoleosa&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CCH&lt;/i>), &lt;i>Camellia polyodonta&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CPO&lt;/i>), &lt;i>Camellia semiserrata&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CSE&lt;/i>) and &lt;i>Camellia reticulata&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CRE&lt;/i>). Reports on the comprehensive comparative analysis of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> are limited. This study investigated the fruit characteristics and nutritional components of four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> fruits, and the results showed that &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> had high oil content with levels of 39.13%-58.84%, especially the &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> fruit, which reached 53.6-58.84%. The contents of lipid concomitants of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oil were also substantial, including β-amyrin (0.87 mg/g-1.41 mg/g), squalene (0.43 mg/g-0.69 mg/g), β-sitosterin (0.47 mg/g-0.63 mg/g) and α-tocopherol (177.52 μg/g-352.27 μg/g). Moreover, the transverse diameter(TD)/longitudinal diameter (LD) of fruits showed a significant positive correlation with the oil content, and &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> fruits with thinner peels seemed to have better oil quality, which is similar to the result of the oil quality evaluation obtained by the gray correlation coefficient evaluation method. Four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils were evaluated using the gray correlation coefficient method based on 11 indicators related to the nutritional value of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i>. &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil had the highest score of 0.8365, and YS-2 (a clone of &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i>) was further evaluated as the best &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil. Finally, the results of heatmap analysis showed that triglycerides could be used as a characteristic substance to distinguish &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil from the other three &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils. The PLSDA (Partial least squares regression analysis) model and VIP (Variable important in projection) values further showed that P/S/O, P/O/O, P/L/L, P/L/Ln, S/S/O, S/O/O and P/S/S (these all represent abbreviations for fatty acids) could be used as characteristic differential triglycerides among the four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils. This study provides a convenient way for planters to assess the nutritional quality of seed oil depending on fruit morphology and a potential way to distinguish between various &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Foods (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><pubmed_title>Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Four Oil-Tea Camellia Species with Red Flowers and Large Fruit.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9857641</pmcid><funding_grant_id>20212BBF63033</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhong S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wei T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wen Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Four Oil-Tea Camellia Species with Red Flowers and Large Fruit.</name><description>Red-flowered oil-tea camellia (&lt;i>ROC&lt;/i>) is an important woody oil species growing in the south, and its oil has high nutritional value. There are four main species of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> in China, namely, &lt;i>Camellia chekiangoleosa&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CCH&lt;/i>), &lt;i>Camellia polyodonta&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CPO&lt;/i>), &lt;i>Camellia semiserrata&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CSE&lt;/i>) and &lt;i>Camellia reticulata&lt;/i> (&lt;i>CRE&lt;/i>). Reports on the comprehensive comparative analysis of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> are limited. This study investigated the fruit characteristics and nutritional components of four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> fruits, and the results showed that &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> had high oil content with levels of 39.13%-58.84%, especially the &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> fruit, which reached 53.6-58.84%. The contents of lipid concomitants of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oil were also substantial, including β-amyrin (0.87 mg/g-1.41 mg/g), squalene (0.43 mg/g-0.69 mg/g), β-sitosterin (0.47 mg/g-0.63 mg/g) and α-tocopherol (177.52 μg/g-352.27 μg/g). Moreover, the transverse diameter(TD)/longitudinal diameter (LD) of fruits showed a significant positive correlation with the oil content, and &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> fruits with thinner peels seemed to have better oil quality, which is similar to the result of the oil quality evaluation obtained by the gray correlation coefficient evaluation method. Four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils were evaluated using the gray correlation coefficient method based on 11 indicators related to the nutritional value of &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i>. &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil had the highest score of 0.8365, and YS-2 (a clone of &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i>) was further evaluated as the best &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil. Finally, the results of heatmap analysis showed that triglycerides could be used as a characteristic substance to distinguish &lt;i>CCH&lt;/i> oil from the other three &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils. The PLSDA (Partial least squares regression analysis) model and VIP (Variable important in projection) values further showed that P/S/O, P/O/O, P/L/L, P/L/Ln, S/S/O, S/O/O and P/S/S (these all represent abbreviations for fatty acids) could be used as characteristic differential triglycerides among the four &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils. This study provides a convenient way for planters to assess the nutritional quality of seed oil depending on fruit morphology and a potential way to distinguish between various &lt;i>ROC&lt;/i> oils.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2024-11-21T01:03:44.565Z</modification><creation>2024-11-21T01:03:44.565Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9857641</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36673466</pubmed><doi>10.3390/foods12020374</doi></cross_references></HashMap>