<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>158(2)</volume><submitter>Famularo S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Clear indications on how to select retreatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still lacking.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To create a machine learning predictive model of survival after HCC recurrence to allocate patients to their best potential treatment.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Real-life data were obtained from an Italian registry of hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2008 and December 2019 after a median (IQR) follow-up of 27 (12-51) months. External validation was made on data derived by another Italian cohort and a Japanese cohort. Patients who experienced a recurrent HCC after a first surgical approach were included. Patients were profiled, and factors predicting survival after recurrence under different treatments that acted also as t</pubmed_abstract><journal>JAMA surgery</journal><pagination>192-202</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9857766</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Machine Learning Predictive Model to Guide Treatment Allocation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9857766</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Antonucci A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molfino S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Russolillo N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montuori M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rossi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kawaguchi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Costa G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valsecchi MG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cosola D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Germani P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zanello M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braga M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conci S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DE Peppo V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farinati F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Delvecchio A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiarelli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Griseri G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abu Hilal M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ardito F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Notte F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tarchi P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Romano F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fazio F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donadon M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giani A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruzzenente A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DE Stefano F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frena A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Milana F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jovine E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>La Barba G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ratti F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bernasconi DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fumagalli L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldrighetti L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zago M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cipriani F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cucchetti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ercolani G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giuffrida M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conticchio M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrari C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manzoni A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Memeo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinotti E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalla Valle R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mori S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Famularo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iaria M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dominioni T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razionale F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Franceschi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hasegawa K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carissimi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corleone P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maestri M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrero A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zimmitti G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grazi GL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marchitelli I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piscaglia F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zanus G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>HE.RC.O.LE.S. Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lai Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larghi Laurerio Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patauner S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvador L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torzilli G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baiocchi GL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giuliante F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Machine Learning Predictive Model to Guide Treatment Allocation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery.</name><description>&lt;h4>Importance&lt;/h4>Clear indications on how to select retreatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still lacking.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To create a machine learning predictive model of survival after HCC recurrence to allocate patients to their best potential treatment.&lt;h4>Design, setting, and participants&lt;/h4>Real-life data were obtained from an Italian registry of hepatocellular carcinoma between January 2008 and December 2019 after a median (IQR) follow-up of 27 (12-51) months. External validation was made on data derived by another Italian cohort and a Japanese cohort. Patients who experienced a recurrent HCC after a first surgical approach were included. Patients were profiled, and factors predicting survival after recurrence under different treatments that acted also as t</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2026-05-28T02:14:32.255Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T19:18:51.107Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9857766</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36576813</pubmed><doi>10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6697</doi></cross_references></HashMap>