<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(1)</volume><submitter>Rizzo A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Recent years have observed the emergence of novel therapeutic opportunities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as combination therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors. We performed a meta-analysis with the aim to compare median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) rate, and partial response (PR) rate in advanced HCC patients receiving immune-based combinations versus sorafenib. A total of 2176 HCC patients were available for the meta-analysis (immune-based combinations = 1334; sorafenib = 842) and four trials were included. Immune-based combinations decreased the risk of death by 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65−0.83; p &lt; 0.001); similarly, a PFS benefit was observed (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.5−0.84; p &lt; 0.001). In addition, imm</pubmed_abstract><journal>Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)</journal><pagination>749-757</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9858216</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Immune-Based Combinations versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9858216</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ricci AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Luca R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rizzo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fanizzi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Massafra R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brandi G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Immune-Based Combinations versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.</name><description>Recent years have observed the emergence of novel therapeutic opportunities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as combination therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors. We performed a meta-analysis with the aim to compare median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR) rate, and partial response (PR) rate in advanced HCC patients receiving immune-based combinations versus sorafenib. A total of 2176 HCC patients were available for the meta-analysis (immune-based combinations = 1334; sorafenib = 842) and four trials were included. Immune-based combinations decreased the risk of death by 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65−0.83; p &lt; 0.001); similarly, a PFS benefit was observed (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.5−0.84; p &lt; 0.001). In addition, imm</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-08-16T03:06:33.818Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:51:44.586Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9858216</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36661706</pubmed><doi>10.3390/curroncol30010057</doi></cross_references></HashMap>