<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(1)</volume><submitter>Zhao F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Both genetic improvement and the application of N fertilizer increase the quality and yields of wheat. However, the molecular kinetics that underlies the differences between them are not well understood. In this study, we performed a non-targeted metabolomic analysis on wheat cultivars from different release years to comprehensively investigate the metabolic differences between cultivar and N treatments. The results revealed that the plant height and tiller number steadily decreased with increased ears numbers, whereas the grain number and weight increased with genetic improvement. Following the addition of N fertilizer, the panicle numbers and grain weights increased in an old cultivar, whereas the panicle number and grain number per panicle increased in a modern cultivar. For the 1950s to 2010s cultivar, the yield increases due to genetic improvements ranged from -1.9% to 96.7%, whereas that of N application ranged from 19.1% to 81.6%. Based on the untargeted metabolomics approach, the findings demonstrated that genetic improvements induced 1.4 to 7.4 times more metabolic alterations than N fertilizer supply. After the addition of N, 69.6%, 29.4%, and 33.3% of the differential metabolites were upregulated in the 1950s, 1980s, and 2010s cultivars, respectively. The results of metabolic pathway analysis of the identified differential metabolites via genetic improvement indicated enrichment in 1-2 KEGG pathways, whereas the application of N fertilizer enriched 2-4 pathways. Our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of wheat quality and grain yield developments.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Metabolites</journal><pagination>107</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9862063</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Metabolite Profiling of Wheat Response to Cultivar Improvement and Nitrogen Fertilizer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9862063</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ye Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Metabolite Profiling of Wheat Response to Cultivar Improvement and Nitrogen Fertilizer.</name><description>Both genetic improvement and the application of N fertilizer increase the quality and yields of wheat. However, the molecular kinetics that underlies the differences between them are not well understood. In this study, we performed a non-targeted metabolomic analysis on wheat cultivars from different release years to comprehensively investigate the metabolic differences between cultivar and N treatments. The results revealed that the plant height and tiller number steadily decreased with increased ears numbers, whereas the grain number and weight increased with genetic improvement. Following the addition of N fertilizer, the panicle numbers and grain weights increased in an old cultivar, whereas the panicle number and grain number per panicle increased in a modern cultivar. For the 1950s to 2010s cultivar, the yield increases due to genetic improvements ranged from -1.9% to 96.7%, whereas that of N application ranged from 19.1% to 81.6%. Based on the untargeted metabolomics approach, the findings demonstrated that genetic improvements induced 1.4 to 7.4 times more metabolic alterations than N fertilizer supply. After the addition of N, 69.6%, 29.4%, and 33.3% of the differential metabolites were upregulated in the 1950s, 1980s, and 2010s cultivars, respectively. The results of metabolic pathway analysis of the identified differential metabolites via genetic improvement indicated enrichment in 1-2 KEGG pathways, whereas the application of N fertilizer enriched 2-4 pathways. Our results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of wheat quality and grain yield developments.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-22T01:06:42.872Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T19:52:05.179Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9862063</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36677032</pubmed><doi>10.3390/metabo13010107</doi></cross_references></HashMap>