<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(2)</volume><submitter>Klemun MM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Linkages between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have sparked research interest because a better understanding of SDG co-benefits may enable faster progress on multiple sustainability fronts. However, SDG linkages are typically analyzed without considering the technologies used to implement a primary SDG, which may have secondary effects on other SDGs. Here, we outline an approach to study this problem by connecting the industries and services required to produce a technology to the United Nations SDG indicator framework, using SDG7 and four energy technologies as an illustrative case. We find that all technologies in our set involve potential co-benefits with SDGs 1, 8-10, 12-13, and 17, and trade-offs with SDGs 6, 8-9, 11-12, and 14-15. Deployment services primarily induce co-benefits; manufacturing has mixed impacts. Our work sheds light on the technology characteristics (e.g., scale, high- or low-tech) that influence linkages while also pointing to SDG-relevant characteristics not captured by UN indicators.</pubmed_abstract><journal>iScience</journal><pagination>105727</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9869479</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Toward evaluating the effect of technology choices on linkages between sustainable development goals.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9869479</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Klemun MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ojanpera S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schweikert A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Toward evaluating the effect of technology choices on linkages between sustainable development goals.</name><description>Linkages between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have sparked research interest because a better understanding of SDG co-benefits may enable faster progress on multiple sustainability fronts. However, SDG linkages are typically analyzed without considering the technologies used to implement a primary SDG, which may have secondary effects on other SDGs. Here, we outline an approach to study this problem by connecting the industries and services required to produce a technology to the United Nations SDG indicator framework, using SDG7 and four energy technologies as an illustrative case. We find that all technologies in our set involve potential co-benefits with SDGs 1, 8-10, 12-13, and 17, and trade-offs with SDGs 6, 8-9, 11-12, and 14-15. Deployment services primarily induce co-benefits; manufacturing has mixed impacts. Our work sheds light on the technology characteristics (e.g., scale, high- or low-tech) that influence linkages while also pointing to SDG-relevant characteristics not captured by UN indicators.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T19:47:49.044Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T19:47:49.044Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9869479</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36698723</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2022.105727</doi></cross_references></HashMap>