<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><submitter>Budnik M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This study aimed to determine the impact of heart failure (HF) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>We analysed data from Polish participants of the EURObservational Research Programme-AF General Long-Term Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoints included hospital readmissions, cardiovascular (CV) interventions, thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events, rhythm control interventions, and other CV or non-CV diseases development during one-year follow up. Overall, 688 patients with available data on HF were included into analysis; 51% (n = 351) had HF; of these 48% (n = 168) had reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 22% (n = 77) mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and 30% (n = 106) preserved EF (HFpEF). Compared with patients without HF, those with HF had higher mortality rate (aHR 5.61; 95% CI 1.94-16.22, P &lt; 0.01). Patients with HF (vs. without HF) had more often CV interventions (10% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.046) and events (14% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.02), and had less often atrial arrhythmia-related hospital admissions (6.8% vs. 15%, P &lt; 0.01). Over follow-up, patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF had similar mortality rate versus HFrEF (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.13-1.57, P = 0.45 for HFmrEF and aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.20-1.48, P = 0.54 for HFpEF). Mortality rate was similar among rhythm versus rate control group (aHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-1.16; P = 0.34).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>AF patients with HF have greater mortality rate and more CV interventions/events. No statistically significant difference in long-term outcomes between patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF highlights the need to develop therapeutic strategies targeting functional status and survival for patients with HF and AF.</pubmed_abstract><journal>ESC heart failure</journal><pagination>637-649</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9871703</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from Polish part of the EORP-AF general long-term registry.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9871703</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Grabowski M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gawalko M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Budnik M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tyminska A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozieranski K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lip GYH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peller M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lodzinski P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kiliszek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balsam P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wancerz A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Opolski G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kalarus Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lenarczyk R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from Polish part of the EORP-AF general long-term registry.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>This study aimed to determine the impact of heart failure (HF) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>We analysed data from Polish participants of the EURObservational Research Programme-AF General Long-Term Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoints included hospital readmissions, cardiovascular (CV) interventions, thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events, rhythm control interventions, and other CV or non-CV diseases development during one-year follow up. Overall, 688 patients with available data on HF were included into analysis; 51% (n = 351) had HF; of these 48% (n = 168) had reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 22% (n = 77) mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and 30% (n = 106) preserved EF (HFpEF). Compared with patients without HF, those with HF had higher mortality rate (aHR 5.61; 95% CI 1.94-16.22, P &lt; 0.01). Patients with HF (vs. without HF) had more often CV interventions (10% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.046) and events (14% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.02), and had less often atrial arrhythmia-related hospital admissions (6.8% vs. 15%, P &lt; 0.01). Over follow-up, patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF had similar mortality rate versus HFrEF (aHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.13-1.57, P = 0.45 for HFmrEF and aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.20-1.48, P = 0.54 for HFpEF). Mortality rate was similar among rhythm versus rate control group (aHR 0.34; 95% CI 0.10-1.16; P = 0.34).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>AF patients with HF have greater mortality rate and more CV interventions/events. No statistically significant difference in long-term outcomes between patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF highlights the need to develop therapeutic strategies targeting functional status and survival for patients with HF and AF.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-04T13:36:22.332Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:36:22.332Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9871703</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36415165</pubmed><doi>10.1002/ehf2.14130</doi></cross_references></HashMap>