<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>27(1)</volume><submitter>Di Stefano G</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Neuropathic pain is an occasionally reported complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has received increased attention in scientific literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to provide information on the frequency of neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19.&lt;h4>Databases and data treatment&lt;/h4>We systematically reviewed and analysed literature regarding neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. We considered prospective and retrospective studies published up until September 2022 (limitations included English language, full-text publications and studies including at least 10 patients). A random effects meta-analysis was performed and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We identified 149 studies. We included 17 studies in the systematic review, and six studies reporting the frequency of neuropathic pain in the acute/subacute phase of COVID-19 in the meta-analysis. The estimated frequency of neuropathic pain ranged between 0.4 and 25%. Forest plot analysis showed that the random effect overall frequency was 10% (95% confidence interval: 5%-15%), with a high level of heterogeneity (Chi&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 104; Tau&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 0.004; df = 5; I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 95%; test for overall effect: Z = 3.584; p &lt; 0.0005). The overall risk of bias was moderate in all studies selected, particularly due to the poor description of neuropathic pain diagnostic criteria.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The pooled estimated frequency of neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19 should be considered with caution due to the high heterogeneity across studies and the poor description of the neuropathic pain diagnostic criteria applied.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Emerging evidence supports the development of neuropathic pain as a complication of COVID-19. However, longitudinal studies enrolling consecutive patients with COVID-19 that detail the diagnostic criteria for neuropathic pain are needed to better assess the frequency of this condition.</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of pain (London, England)</journal><pagination>44-53</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9877974</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuropathic pain associated with coronavirus disease 2019.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9877974</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Leone C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galosi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Truini A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falco P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Stefano G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Pietro G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuropathic pain associated with coronavirus disease 2019.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Neuropathic pain is an occasionally reported complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) that has received increased attention in scientific literature. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to provide information on the frequency of neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19.&lt;h4>Databases and data treatment&lt;/h4>We systematically reviewed and analysed literature regarding neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. We considered prospective and retrospective studies published up until September 2022 (limitations included English language, full-text publications and studies including at least 10 patients). A random effects meta-analysis was performed and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>We identified 149 studies. We included 17 studies in the systematic review, and six studies reporting the frequency of neuropathic pain in the acute/subacute phase of COVID-19 in the meta-analysis. The estimated frequency of neuropathic pain ranged between 0.4 and 25%. Forest plot analysis showed that the random effect overall frequency was 10% (95% confidence interval: 5%-15%), with a high level of heterogeneity (Chi&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 104; Tau&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 0.004; df = 5; I&lt;sup>2&lt;/sup>  = 95%; test for overall effect: Z = 3.584; p &lt; 0.0005). The overall risk of bias was moderate in all studies selected, particularly due to the poor description of neuropathic pain diagnostic criteria.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The pooled estimated frequency of neuropathic pain associated with COVID-19 should be considered with caution due to the high heterogeneity across studies and the poor description of the neuropathic pain diagnostic criteria applied.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Emerging evidence supports the development of neuropathic pain as a complication of COVID-19. However, longitudinal studies enrolling consecutive patients with COVID-19 that detail the diagnostic criteria for neuropathic pain are needed to better assess the frequency of this condition.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-25T20:16:01.712Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T08:18:01.255Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9877974</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36367322</pubmed><doi>10.1002/ejp.2055</doi></cross_references></HashMap>