<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>4(2)</volume><submitter>Hofman V</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Gene fusion testing of &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>, &lt;i>ROS1&lt;/i>, &lt;i>RET&lt;/i>, &lt;i>NTRK&lt;/i>, and &lt;i>MET&lt;/i> exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC case</pubmed_abstract><journal>JTO clinical and research reports</journal><pagination>100457</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9883235</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9883235</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Evrard S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marquette CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Begueret H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allegra M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caumont C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barritault M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vigier A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brousset P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benzerdjeb N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lespinet-Fabre V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bordone O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boutros J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salah M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bontoux C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benzaquen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tanga V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bringuier PP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fenouil T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chalabreysse L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heeke S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofman V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Merlio JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sabourin JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lassalle S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ilie M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Long-Mira E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Syrykh C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazieres J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonnetaud C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piton N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Ultrafast Gene Fusion Assessment for Nonsquamous NSCLC.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Gene fusion testing of &lt;i>ALK&lt;/i>, &lt;i>ROS1&lt;/i>, &lt;i>RET&lt;/i>, &lt;i>NTRK&lt;/i>, and &lt;i>MET&lt;/i> exon 14 skipping mutations is guideline recommended in nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC). Nevertheless, assessment is often hindered by the limited availability of tissue and prolonged next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing, which can protract the initiation of a targeted therapy. Therefore, the development of faster gene fusion assessment is critical for optimal clinical decision-making. Here, we compared two ultrafast gene fusion assays (UFGFAs) using NGS (Genexus, Oncomine Precision Assay, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Idylla, GeneFusion Assay, Biocartis) approach at diagnosis in a retrospective series of 195 NS-NSCLC case</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-21T22:37:00.483Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T18:48:54.443Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9883235</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36718140</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100457</doi></cross_references></HashMap>