<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>24(10)</volume><submitter>Ho TJH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Schools offer an ideal setting for childhood obesity interventions due to their access to children and adolescents. This review aimed to systematically review the impact of school-based intervention for the treatment of childhood obesity.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Eight databases were searched from inception till 30 May 2020. A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to evaluate the risk of bias and overall evidence. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on Stata software using the random effects model. Overall effect was evaluated using Hedges' g, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Cluster randomised controlled trials (cluster-RCT) delivered in sc</pubmed_abstract><journal>Public health nutrition</journal><pagination>3087-3099</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9884753</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>School-based interventions for the treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of cluster randomised controlled trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9884753</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ho TJH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lau Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng LJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>School-based interventions for the treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of cluster randomised controlled trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Schools offer an ideal setting for childhood obesity interventions due to their access to children and adolescents. This review aimed to systematically review the impact of school-based intervention for the treatment of childhood obesity.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Eight databases were searched from inception till 30 May 2020. A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to evaluate the risk of bias and overall evidence. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on Stata software using the random effects model. Overall effect was evaluated using Hedges' g, and heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and I2.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Cluster randomised controlled trials (cluster-RCT) delivered in sc</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jul</publication><modification>2026-03-15T16:08:34.103Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T17:07:06.333Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9884753</accession><cross_references><pubmed>33745501</pubmed><doi>10.1017/s1368980021001117</doi><doi>10.1017/S1368980021001117</doi></cross_references></HashMap>