<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hong G</submitter><funding>Korea Health Technology R&amp;D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health &amp; Welfare, Republic of Korea</funding><funding>Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology</funding><funding>Korea Health Technology R&amp;amp;D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health &amp;amp; Welfare, Republic of Korea</funding><funding>Chungnam National University Hospital Research Fund</funding><pagination>159-171</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9889409</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>149(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Although increased plasma growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) levels have been reported in patients with various cancers, the predictive role of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced cancers remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate GDF15 levels as a predictive marker in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and analyze their association with immune cell populations.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study included 87 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between March 2018 and May 2020. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and months after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor administration.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the low GDF15 than in the high GDF15 group (39.2% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the low GDF15 than in the high GDF15 group (13.2 [95% CI 7.6-18.9] vs. 7.2 [95% CI 4.8-9.6] months, P = 0.048). Moreover, plasma GDF15 levels negatively correlated with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>/CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells (r = - 0.399, P = 0.003) and positively with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>/Treg cells (r = 0.507, P &lt; 0.001) and PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>Treg/CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells (r = 0.439, P &lt; 0.001). The ORR was significantly higher in the group with decreased GDF15 from baseline than in the increased GDF15 group (37.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.026). The median PFS was significantly longer in the decreased GDF15 group (14.8 [95% CI 10.4-19.2] vs. 5.9 [95% CI 2.8-9.0] months, P = 0.002). Plasma GDF15 levels were associated with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells and PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> Treg cells.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Plasma GDF15 could be a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy and survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Plasma GDF15 levels associated with circulating immune cells predict the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9889409</pmcid><funding_grant_id>HR22C1734</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NRF-2022R1C1C1007301</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>NRF-2021R1C1C1011183</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2021</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chung C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hong G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang YE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Plasma GDF15 levels associated with circulating immune cells predict the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Although increased plasma growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15) levels have been reported in patients with various cancers, the predictive role of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced cancers remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate GDF15 levels as a predictive marker in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and analyze their association with immune cell populations.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study included 87 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between March 2018 and May 2020. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and months after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor administration.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the low GDF15 than in the high GDF15 group (39.2% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.013). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the low GDF15 than in the high GDF15 group (13.2 [95% CI 7.6-18.9] vs. 7.2 [95% CI 4.8-9.6] months, P = 0.048). Moreover, plasma GDF15 levels negatively correlated with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>/CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells (r = - 0.399, P = 0.003) and positively with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>/Treg cells (r = 0.507, P &lt; 0.001) and PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>Treg/CD4&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells (r = 0.439, P &lt; 0.001). The ORR was significantly higher in the group with decreased GDF15 from baseline than in the increased GDF15 group (37.2% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.026). The median PFS was significantly longer in the decreased GDF15 group (14.8 [95% CI 10.4-19.2] vs. 5.9 [95% CI 2.8-9.0] months, P = 0.002). Plasma GDF15 levels were associated with PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup>CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T cells and PD-1&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> Treg cells.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>Plasma GDF15 could be a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy and survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-21T22:49:48.282Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T18:52:42.686Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9889409</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36472770</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00432-022-04500-5</doi></cross_references></HashMap>