{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["13"],"submitter":["Gao LR"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>To quantitatively characterize the dosimetric effects of long on-couch time in prostate cancer patients treated with adaptive ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) on 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance (MR)-linac.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Seventeen patients consecutively treated with UHF-RT on a 1.5-T MR-linac were recruited. A 36.25 Gy dose in five fractions was delivered every other day with a boost of 40 Gy to the whole prostate. We collected data for the following stages: pre-MR, position verification-MR (PV-MR) in the Adapt-To-Shape (ATS) workflow, and 3D-MR during the beam-on phase (Bn-MR) and at the end of RT (post-MR). The target and organ-at-risk contours in the PV-MR, Bn-MR, and post-MR stages were projected from the pre-MR data by deformable image registration and manually adapted by the physician, followed by dose recalculation for the ATS plan.<h4>Results</h4>Overall, 290 MR scans were collected (85 pre-MR, 85 PV-MR, 49 Bn-MR and 71 post-MR scans). With a median on-couch time of 49 minutes, the mean planning target volume (PTV)-V<sub>95%</sub> of all scans was 97.83 ± 0.13%. The corresponding mean clinical target volume (CTV)-V<sub>100%</sub> was 99.93 ± 0.30%, 99.32 ± 1.20%, 98.59 ± 1.84%, and 98.69 ± 1.85%. With excellent prostate-V<sub>100%</sub> dose coverage, the main reason for lower CTV-V<sub>100%</sub> was slight underdosing of seminal vesicles (SVs). The median V<sub>29 Gy</sub> change in the rectal wall was -1% (-20%-17%). The V<sub>29 Gy</sub> of the rectal wall increased by >15% was observed in one scan. A slight increase in the high dose of bladder wall was noted due to gradual bladder growth during the workflow.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This 3D-MR-based dosimetry analysis demonstrated clinically acceptable estimated dose coverage of target volumes during the beam-on period with adaptive ATS workflow on 1.5-T MR-linac, albeit with a relatively long on-couch time. The 3-mm CTV-PTV margin was adequate for prostate irradiation but occasionally insufficient for SVs. More attention should be paid to restricting high-dose RT to the rectal wall when optimizing the ATS plan."],"journal":["Frontiers in oncology"],"pagination":["1039901"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9893501"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Assessment of delivered dose in prostate cancer patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy on 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac."],"pmcid":["PMC9893501"],"pubmed_authors":["Gao LR","Fang H","Jing H","Wang MS","Song YW","Qi SN","Xing NZ","Chen B","Yan LL","Liu YP","Lu NN","Tian Y","Wang SL","Xia WL","Qin SR","Li YX","Tang Y"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Assessment of delivered dose in prostate cancer patients treated with ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy on 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>To quantitatively characterize the dosimetric effects of long on-couch time in prostate cancer patients treated with adaptive ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) on 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance (MR)-linac.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Seventeen patients consecutively treated with UHF-RT on a 1.5-T MR-linac were recruited. A 36.25 Gy dose in five fractions was delivered every other day with a boost of 40 Gy to the whole prostate. We collected data for the following stages: pre-MR, position verification-MR (PV-MR) in the Adapt-To-Shape (ATS) workflow, and 3D-MR during the beam-on phase (Bn-MR) and at the end of RT (post-MR). The target and organ-at-risk contours in the PV-MR, Bn-MR, and post-MR stages were projected from the pre-MR data by deformable image registration and manually adapted by the physician, followed by dose recalculation for the ATS plan.<h4>Results</h4>Overall, 290 MR scans were collected (85 pre-MR, 85 PV-MR, 49 Bn-MR and 71 post-MR scans). With a median on-couch time of 49 minutes, the mean planning target volume (PTV)-V<sub>95%</sub> of all scans was 97.83 ± 0.13%. The corresponding mean clinical target volume (CTV)-V<sub>100%</sub> was 99.93 ± 0.30%, 99.32 ± 1.20%, 98.59 ± 1.84%, and 98.69 ± 1.85%. With excellent prostate-V<sub>100%</sub> dose coverage, the main reason for lower CTV-V<sub>100%</sub> was slight underdosing of seminal vesicles (SVs). The median V<sub>29 Gy</sub> change in the rectal wall was -1% (-20%-17%). The V<sub>29 Gy</sub> of the rectal wall increased by >15% was observed in one scan. A slight increase in the high dose of bladder wall was noted due to gradual bladder growth during the workflow.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This 3D-MR-based dosimetry analysis demonstrated clinically acceptable estimated dose coverage of target volumes during the beam-on period with adaptive ATS workflow on 1.5-T MR-linac, albeit with a relatively long on-couch time. The 3-mm CTV-PTV margin was adequate for prostate irradiation but occasionally insufficient for SVs. More attention should be paid to restricting high-dose RT to the rectal wall when optimizing the ATS plan.","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023","modification":"2025-04-05T13:30:45.98Z","creation":"2025-04-05T13:30:45.98Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9893501","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36741014"],"doi":["10.3389/fonc.2023.1039901"]}}