<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(1_suppl)</volume><submitter>Frazier MC</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Many hand surgeons prefer to close palmar wounds with non-absorbable mattress sutures. Suture removal can be painful and time-consuming. In this study, we investigated if suture removal can be facilitated by including a vessel loop in wound closure following open carpal tunnel release (CTR).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Overall, 47 patients aged 18 to 75 undergoing elective primary open unilateral CTR completed this unblinded, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial. Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 study arms: (1) wound closure without a vessel loop (standard, n = 28); or (2) wound closure with a vessel loop (vessel loop, n = 19). Data were collected on time for wound closure and for suture removal. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess satisfaction and pain </pubmed_abstract><journal>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</journal><pagination>84S-90S</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9896281</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9896281</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Apel PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomooka LBH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hagan HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frazier MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Foeger N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Including a Vessel Loop in Wound Closure Facilitates Suture Removal Following Open Carpal Tunnel Release.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Many hand surgeons prefer to close palmar wounds with non-absorbable mattress sutures. Suture removal can be painful and time-consuming. In this study, we investigated if suture removal can be facilitated by including a vessel loop in wound closure following open carpal tunnel release (CTR).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Overall, 47 patients aged 18 to 75 undergoing elective primary open unilateral CTR completed this unblinded, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial. Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 study arms: (1) wound closure without a vessel loop (standard, n = 28); or (2) wound closure with a vessel loop (vessel loop, n = 19). Data were collected on time for wound closure and for suture removal. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess satisfaction and pain </description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2026-03-27T15:43:57.356Z</modification><creation>2025-08-28T03:05:47.017Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9896281</accession><cross_references><pubmed>35658685</pubmed><doi>10.1177/15589447221092062</doi></cross_references></HashMap>