{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["32(2)"],"submitter":["Aitken CA"],"funding":["Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>In the Netherlands, lower high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positivity but higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection were found in self-collected compared with clinician-collected samples. To investigate the possible reason for these differences, we compared sociodemographic and screening characteristics of women and related these to screening outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We extracted data from PALGA on all primary hrHPV screens and associated follow-up tests for 857,866 screened women, invited in 2017 and 2018. We linked these data with sociodemographic data from Statistics Netherlands. Logistic regression was performed for hrHPV positivity and CIN 2+/3+ detection.<h4>Results</h4>Out of the 857,866 women, 6.8% chose to use a self-sampling device. A h"],"journal":["Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology"],"pagination":["183-192"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9900317"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study."],"pmcid":["PMC9900317"],"pubmed_authors":["Inturrisi F","de Kok IMCM","Kaljouw S","van Kemenade FJ","Niesters HGM","Berkhof J","Hinrichs JWJ","Aitken CA","Molijn A","Nieboer D","Melchers WJG","Siebers AG","van den Brule AJC"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>In the Netherlands, lower high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positivity but higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection were found in self-collected compared with clinician-collected samples. To investigate the possible reason for these differences, we compared sociodemographic and screening characteristics of women and related these to screening outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We extracted data from PALGA on all primary hrHPV screens and associated follow-up tests for 857,866 screened women, invited in 2017 and 2018. We linked these data with sociodemographic data from Statistics Netherlands. Logistic regression was performed for hrHPV positivity and CIN 2+/3+ detection.<h4>Results</h4>Out of the 857,866 women, 6.8% chose to use a self-sampling device. A h","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Feb","modification":"2025-04-22T12:38:16.998Z","creation":"2025-04-06T00:20:38.119Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9900317","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36099416"],"doi":["10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0712"]}}