<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>32(2)</volume><submitter>Aitken CA</submitter><funding>Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In the Netherlands, lower high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positivity but higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection were found in self-collected compared with clinician-collected samples. To investigate the possible reason for these differences, we compared sociodemographic and screening characteristics of women and related these to screening outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We extracted data from PALGA on all primary hrHPV screens and associated follow-up tests for 857,866 screened women, invited in 2017 and 2018. We linked these data with sociodemographic data from Statistics Netherlands. Logistic regression was performed for hrHPV positivity and CIN 2+/3+ detection.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of the 857,866 women, 6.8% chose to use a self-sampling device. A h</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers &amp; prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology</journal><pagination>183-192</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9900317</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9900317</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Inturrisi F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Kok IMCM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaljouw S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Kemenade FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niesters HGM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berkhof J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hinrichs JWJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aitken CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molijn A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nieboer D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Melchers WJG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siebers AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van den Brule AJC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In the Netherlands, lower high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) positivity but higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ detection were found in self-collected compared with clinician-collected samples. To investigate the possible reason for these differences, we compared sociodemographic and screening characteristics of women and related these to screening outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We extracted data from PALGA on all primary hrHPV screens and associated follow-up tests for 857,866 screened women, invited in 2017 and 2018. We linked these data with sociodemographic data from Statistics Netherlands. Logistic regression was performed for hrHPV positivity and CIN 2+/3+ detection.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of the 857,866 women, 6.8% chose to use a self-sampling device. A h</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T12:38:16.998Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:20:38.119Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9900317</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36099416</pubmed><doi>10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0712</doi></cross_references></HashMap>