{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["18(2)"],"submitter":["Olsson TM"],"pubmed_abstract":["Publication and related biases constitute serious threats to the validity of research synthesis. If research syntheses are based on a biased selection of the available research, there is an increased risk of producing misleading results. The purpose fo this study is to explore the extent of positive outcome bias, time-lag bias, and place-of-publication bias in published research on the effects of psychological, social, and behavioral interventions. The results are based on 527 Swedish outcome trials published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2019. We found no difference in the number of studies reporting significant compared to non-significant findings or in the number of studies reporting strong effect sizes in the published literature. We found no evidence of time-lag bias or p"],"journal":["PloS one"],"pagination":["e0281110"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9901762"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Publication bias, time-lag bias, and place-of-publication bias in social intervention research: An exploratory study of 527 Swedish articles published between 1990-2019."],"pmcid":["PMC9901762"],"pubmed_authors":["Sundell K","Olsson TM"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Publication bias, time-lag bias, and place-of-publication bias in social intervention research: An exploratory study of 527 Swedish articles published between 1990-2019.","description":"Publication and related biases constitute serious threats to the validity of research synthesis. If research syntheses are based on a biased selection of the available research, there is an increased risk of producing misleading results. The purpose fo this study is to explore the extent of positive outcome bias, time-lag bias, and place-of-publication bias in published research on the effects of psychological, social, and behavioral interventions. The results are based on 527 Swedish outcome trials published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2019. We found no difference in the number of studies reporting significant compared to non-significant findings or in the number of studies reporting strong effect sizes in the published literature. We found no evidence of time-lag bias or p","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023","modification":"2025-04-04T08:31:19.423Z","creation":"2025-04-04T08:31:19.423Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9901762","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36745625"],"doi":["10.1371/journal.pone.0281110"]}}