<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13</volume><submitter>Tian F</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased. However, the long-term outcomes of LLR for HCCs should be validated further. Besides, the validity of laparoscopic minor liver resection in difficult segments (1, 4a, 7, 8) (LMLR-DS) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for HCCs need to be studied.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 1773 HCC patients were collected: 683 received LLR and 1090 received OLR. Propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 ratio was used to eliminate the selection bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. In subgroup analyses, the validity of LMLR-DS or LMH for HCCs was studied.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After PSM, 567 patients were in LLR or OLR group. LLR had lower intraoperative blood-loss and shorter postoperative</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>1112380</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9905741</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center 10-year experience.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9905741</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Cao L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tian F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leng S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single-center 10-year experience.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased. However, the long-term outcomes of LLR for HCCs should be validated further. Besides, the validity of laparoscopic minor liver resection in difficult segments (1, 4a, 7, 8) (LMLR-DS) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for HCCs need to be studied.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A total of 1773 HCC patients were collected: 683 received LLR and 1090 received OLR. Propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 ratio was used to eliminate the selection bias. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared. In subgroup analyses, the validity of LMLR-DS or LMH for HCCs was studied.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>After PSM, 567 patients were in LLR or OLR group. LLR had lower intraoperative blood-loss and shorter postoperative</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023</publication><modification>2025-04-04T18:44:10.626Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T18:44:10.626Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9905741</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36761978</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2023.1112380</doi></cross_references></HashMap>