<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Savic Kallesoe SA</submitter><funding>Genome Canada</funding><pagination>e066418</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9905784</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>COVID-19 research has significantly contributed to pandemic response and the enhancement of public health capacity. COVID-19 data collected by provincial/territorial health authorities in Canada are valuable for research advancement yet not readily available to the public, including researchers. To inform developments in public health data-sharing in Canada, we explored Canadians' opinions of public health authorities sharing deidentified individual-level COVID-19 data publicly.&lt;h4>Design/setting/interventions/outcomes&lt;/h4>A national cross-sectional survey was administered in Canada in March 2022, assessing Canadians' opinions on publicly sharing COVID-19 datatypes. Market research firm Léger was employed for recruitment and data collection.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Anyone greater than or equal to 18 years and currently living in Canada.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>4981 participants completed the survey with a 92.3% response rate. 79.7% were supportive of provincial/territorial authorities publicly sharing deidentified COVID-19 data, while 20.3% were hesitant/averse/unsure. Datatypes most supported for being shared publicly were symptoms (83.0% in support), geographical region (82.6%) and COVID-19 vaccination status (81.7%). Datatypes with the most aversion were employment sector (27.4% averse), postal area (26.7%) and international travel history (19.7%). Generally supportive Canadians were characterised as being ≥50 years, with higher education, and being vaccinated against COVID-19 at least once. Vaccination status was the most influential predictor of data-sharing opinion, with respondents who were ever vaccinated being 4.20 times more likely (95% CI 3.21 to 5.48, p=0.000) to be generally supportive of data-sharing than those unvaccinated.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These findings suggest that the Canadian public is generally favourable to deidentified data-sharing. Identifying factors that are likely to improve attitudes towards data-sharing are useful to stakeholders involved in data-sharing initiatives, such as public health agencies, in informing the development of public health communication and data-sharing policies. As Canada progresses through the COVID-19 pandemic, and with limited testing and reporting of COVID-19 data, it is essential to improve deidentified data-sharing given the public's general support for these efforts.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Canadians' opinions towards COVID-19 data-sharing: a national cross-sectional survey.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9905784</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R549067</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palmour N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savic Kallesoe SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rabbani T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gill EE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Griffiths EJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zawati M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joly Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsiao WWL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brinkman F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Canadians' opinions towards COVID-19 data-sharing: a national cross-sectional survey.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>COVID-19 research has significantly contributed to pandemic response and the enhancement of public health capacity. COVID-19 data collected by provincial/territorial health authorities in Canada are valuable for research advancement yet not readily available to the public, including researchers. To inform developments in public health data-sharing in Canada, we explored Canadians' opinions of public health authorities sharing deidentified individual-level COVID-19 data publicly.&lt;h4>Design/setting/interventions/outcomes&lt;/h4>A national cross-sectional survey was administered in Canada in March 2022, assessing Canadians' opinions on publicly sharing COVID-19 datatypes. Market research firm Léger was employed for recruitment and data collection.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Anyone greater than or equal to 18 years and currently living in Canada.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>4981 participants completed the survey with a 92.3% response rate. 79.7% were supportive of provincial/territorial authorities publicly sharing deidentified COVID-19 data, while 20.3% were hesitant/averse/unsure. Datatypes most supported for being shared publicly were symptoms (83.0% in support), geographical region (82.6%) and COVID-19 vaccination status (81.7%). Datatypes with the most aversion were employment sector (27.4% averse), postal area (26.7%) and international travel history (19.7%). Generally supportive Canadians were characterised as being ≥50 years, with higher education, and being vaccinated against COVID-19 at least once. Vaccination status was the most influential predictor of data-sharing opinion, with respondents who were ever vaccinated being 4.20 times more likely (95% CI 3.21 to 5.48, p=0.000) to be generally supportive of data-sharing than those unvaccinated.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>These findings suggest that the Canadian public is generally favourable to deidentified data-sharing. Identifying factors that are likely to improve attitudes towards data-sharing are useful to stakeholders involved in data-sharing initiatives, such as public health agencies, in informing the development of public health communication and data-sharing policies. As Canada progresses through the COVID-19 pandemic, and with limited testing and reporting of COVID-19 data, it is essential to improve deidentified data-sharing given the public's general support for these efforts.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T09:39:41.727Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:07:58.966Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9905784</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36750286</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066418</doi></cross_references></HashMap>