<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><submitter>Topole E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Rationale&lt;/h4>Acquiring high-quality spirometry data in clinical trials is important, particularly when using forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity as primary end-points. In addition to quantitative criteria, the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) standards include subjective evaluation which introduces inter-rater variability and potential mistakes. We explored the value of artificial intelligence (AI)-based software (ArtiQ.QC) to assess spirometry quality and compared it to traditional over-reading control.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A random sample of 2000 sessions (8258 curves) was selected from Chiesi COPD and asthma trials (n=1000 per disease). Acceptability using the 2005 ATS/ERS standards was determined by over-reader review and by ArtiQ.Q</pubmed_abstract><journal>ERJ open research</journal><pagination>00292-2022</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9907146</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Artificial intelligence based software facilitates spirometry quality control in asthma and COPD clinical trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9907146</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Biondaro S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanojevic S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ray K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montagna I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corradi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graham B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Das N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Topole E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corre S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Topalovic M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Artificial intelligence based software facilitates spirometry quality control in asthma and COPD clinical trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Rationale&lt;/h4>Acquiring high-quality spirometry data in clinical trials is important, particularly when using forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity as primary end-points. In addition to quantitative criteria, the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) standards include subjective evaluation which introduces inter-rater variability and potential mistakes. We explored the value of artificial intelligence (AI)-based software (ArtiQ.QC) to assess spirometry quality and compared it to traditional over-reading control.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A random sample of 2000 sessions (8258 curves) was selected from Chiesi COPD and asthma trials (n=1000 per disease). Acceptability using the 2005 ATS/ERS standards was determined by over-reader review and by ArtiQ.Q</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-19T20:51:21.995Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T20:51:21.995Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9907146</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36776483</pubmed><doi>10.1183/23120541.00292-2022</doi></cross_references></HashMap>