<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(13)</volume><submitter>Fabris E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The long-term prognostic implications of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions hosting vulnerable plaques remain unsettled.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of non-ischaemic lesions hosting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA) with first and recurrent cardiovascular events during follow-up up to 5 years in a diabetes mellitus (DM) patient population.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>COMBINE OCT-FFR is a prospective, international, double-blind, natural history study. Patients with DM and with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion were classified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ≥1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint (PE) is a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or unstable angina (UA) requiring hospitalisation during follow-up up to 5 years.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 390 DM patients (age 67.5±9 years; 37% female) with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion, 292 (74.9%) were TCFA-negative while 98 (25.1%) were TCFA-positive. The PE occurred more frequently in TCFA-positive than in TCFA-negative patients (21.4% vs 8.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-5.20; p&lt;0.001; 6.42 vs 2.46 events per 100 patient-years, rate ratio [RR] 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38-4.90; p=0.002). Furthermore, when TV-MI, TLR, and UA were treated as recurrent components of the PE, TCFA-positive patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent events (HR 2.89, 95% CI; 1.74-4.80; p&lt;0.001; 13.45 vs 2.87 events per 100 patient-years, RR 4.69, 95% CI: 2.86-7.83; p&lt;0.001). A multivariable analysis identified the presence of TCFA as an independent predictor of the PE (HR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.53-4.97; p&lt;0.001).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>OCT-detected TCFA-positive lesions, although not ischaemia-generating, are associated with an increased risk of adverse events during long-term follow-up.&lt;h4>Clinicaltrials&lt;/h4>gov: NCT02989740.</pubmed_abstract><journal>EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pagination>e1099-e1107</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9909454</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term outcomes of patients with normal fractional flow reserve and thin-cap fibroatheroma.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9909454</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hermanides RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von Birgelen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pereira B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Camaro C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rivero F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reith S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gasior P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wojakowski W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nef H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malinowski KP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Escaned J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kennedy MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kedhi E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berta B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hommels T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia-Garcia HM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roleder T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Luca G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roleder-Dylewska M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fabris E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Granada JF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term outcomes of patients with normal fractional flow reserve and thin-cap fibroatheroma.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The long-term prognostic implications of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-negative lesions hosting vulnerable plaques remain unsettled.&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of non-ischaemic lesions hosting optical coherence tomography (OCT)-detected thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA) with first and recurrent cardiovascular events during follow-up up to 5 years in a diabetes mellitus (DM) patient population.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>COMBINE OCT-FFR is a prospective, international, double-blind, natural history study. Patients with DM and with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion were classified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of ≥1 TCFA lesion. The primary endpoint (PE) is a composite of cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR), or unstable angina (UA) requiring hospitalisation during follow-up up to 5 years.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 390 DM patients (age 67.5±9 years; 37% female) with ≥1 FFR-negative lesion, 292 (74.9%) were TCFA-negative while 98 (25.1%) were TCFA-positive. The PE occurred more frequently in TCFA-positive than in TCFA-negative patients (21.4% vs 8.2%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-5.20; p&lt;0.001; 6.42 vs 2.46 events per 100 patient-years, rate ratio [RR] 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38-4.90; p=0.002). Furthermore, when TV-MI, TLR, and UA were treated as recurrent components of the PE, TCFA-positive patients experienced a higher risk of recurrent events (HR 2.89, 95% CI; 1.74-4.80; p&lt;0.001; 13.45 vs 2.87 events per 100 patient-years, RR 4.69, 95% CI: 2.86-7.83; p&lt;0.001). A multivariable analysis identified the presence of TCFA as an independent predictor of the PE (HR 2.76, 95% CI: 1.53-4.97; p&lt;0.001).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>OCT-detected TCFA-positive lesions, although not ischaemia-generating, are associated with an increased risk of adverse events during long-term follow-up.&lt;h4>Clinicaltrials&lt;/h4>gov: NCT02989740.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2024-11-20T13:04:03.929Z</modification><creation>2024-11-20T13:04:03.929Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9909454</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36170036</pubmed><doi>10.4244/eij-d-22-00306</doi><doi>10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00306</doi></cross_references></HashMap>