{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["18(3)"],"submitter":["Chen F"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>It is unknown whether there are differences in coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between bicuspid and tricuspid anatomy.<h4>Aims</h4>Our aim was to investigate coronary access after TAVR using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (BAV vs TAV), based on CT simulation.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 86 type 0 BAV, 70 type 1 BAV, and 132 TAV patients were included. If the coronary ostium faced the sealed parts of the THV or the tilted-up native leaflet (NL), this was defined as THV- or NL-related challenging coronary access, respectively. If coaxial engagement was not allowed due to interference from the unwrapped frame, THV-related complex coronary access was defined.<h4>Results</h4>The inc"],"journal":["EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology"],"pagination":["203-212"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9912966"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis."],"pmcid":["PMC9912966"],"pubmed_authors":["Peng Y","Zhu Z","Chen M","Feng Y","Chen F","Wei X","Li Q","Xiong T","Zhao Z","Jia K","Li X","Li Y","He S","Ou Y","Wang X","Wei J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>It is unknown whether there are differences in coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between bicuspid and tricuspid anatomy.<h4>Aims</h4>Our aim was to investigate coronary access after TAVR using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (THV) in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves (BAV vs TAV), based on CT simulation.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 86 type 0 BAV, 70 type 1 BAV, and 132 TAV patients were included. If the coronary ostium faced the sealed parts of the THV or the tilted-up native leaflet (NL), this was defined as THV- or NL-related challenging coronary access, respectively. If coaxial engagement was not allowed due to interference from the unwrapped frame, THV-related complex coronary access was defined.<h4>Results</h4>The inc","dates":{"release":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2022 Jun","modification":"2026-03-27T15:42:39.924Z","creation":"2025-04-04T18:43:03.746Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9912966","cross_references":{"pubmed":["35236643"],"doi":["10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00970","10.4244/eij-d-21-00970"]}}