{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Morales C"],"funding":["Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo"],"pagination":["509"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9920548"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["12(3)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Drought is widely recognized as one of the most significant agricultural constraints worldwide. A strategy to avoid the adverse effects of drought on crops is to cultivate high-yielding varieties by grafting them onto drought-tolerant rootstocks with a differentiated root system. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate fruit yield and quality, root system architecture, and water productivity of watermelon grafted onto <i>Lagenaria siceraria</i> rootstocks. To do so, a commercial watermelon cultivar \"Santa Amelia\" [<i>Citrullus lanatus</i> (Thunb.)] was grafted onto five <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks: 'Illapel', 'Osorno', 'BG-48', 'GC', and 'Philippines', which were grown under three irrigation treatments (100%, 75%, and 50% of evapotranspiration). The comparison of the <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks in the irrigation treatments demonstrated no significant effect on watermelon fruit quality parameters. The rootstocks 'Illapel', 'Osorno', and 'GC' significantly improved the fruit number and yield (total fruit weight) under water deficit. Similarly, 'Illapel', 'Osorno', and 'GC' consistently showed statistical differences for root system architecture traits compared to 'BG-48' and 'Philippines'. Based on these results, we concluded that the used <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks did not affect the fruit yield and quality of grafted watermelon under water deficit. This study may help adjust the amount of applied water for watermelon production where <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks are utilized."],"journal":["Plants (Basel, Switzerland)"],"pubmed_title":["Rootstocks Comparison in Grafted Watermelon under Water Deficit: Effects on the Fruit Quality and Yield."],"pmcid":["PMC9920548"],"funding_grant_id":["Fondecyt 11180278"],"pubmed_authors":["Pinto C","Riveros-Burgos C","Maldonado C","Morales C","Mashilo J","Espinoza Seguel F","Contreras-Soto RI"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Rootstocks Comparison in Grafted Watermelon under Water Deficit: Effects on the Fruit Quality and Yield.","description":"Drought is widely recognized as one of the most significant agricultural constraints worldwide. A strategy to avoid the adverse effects of drought on crops is to cultivate high-yielding varieties by grafting them onto drought-tolerant rootstocks with a differentiated root system. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate fruit yield and quality, root system architecture, and water productivity of watermelon grafted onto <i>Lagenaria siceraria</i> rootstocks. To do so, a commercial watermelon cultivar \"Santa Amelia\" [<i>Citrullus lanatus</i> (Thunb.)] was grafted onto five <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks: 'Illapel', 'Osorno', 'BG-48', 'GC', and 'Philippines', which were grown under three irrigation treatments (100%, 75%, and 50% of evapotranspiration). The comparison of the <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks in the irrigation treatments demonstrated no significant effect on watermelon fruit quality parameters. The rootstocks 'Illapel', 'Osorno', and 'GC' significantly improved the fruit number and yield (total fruit weight) under water deficit. Similarly, 'Illapel', 'Osorno', and 'GC' consistently showed statistical differences for root system architecture traits compared to 'BG-48' and 'Philippines'. Based on these results, we concluded that the used <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks did not affect the fruit yield and quality of grafted watermelon under water deficit. This study may help adjust the amount of applied water for watermelon production where <i>L. siceraria</i> rootstocks are utilized.","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Jan","modification":"2025-04-25T19:18:29.689Z","creation":"2025-04-06T07:57:40.366Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9920548","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36771594"],"doi":["10.3390/plants12030509"]}}