biostudies-literaturePatch MJonas Nurse Leaders Scholar ProgramNIAAA NIH HHSNational Institutes of Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismEmergency Nurses Association Foundation1575-1588https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9922028biostudies-literatureUnknown79(4)<h4>Aims</h4>The aim was to examine and describe women's emergency department visits and care-seeking experiences, including recognition, evaluation and communication of symptoms, injuries and health risks after non-fatal intimate partner strangulation.<h4>Design</h4>Using a diagnostic process framework, this mixed-methods study explores concordance and discordance of interview and medical records data to highlight opportunities for clinical diagnostic improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In-depth, semi-structured interviews with women after an emergency department visit for non-fatal intimate partner strangulation, concurrent with medical records reviews, were conducted between March 2018 and January 2019. A constant comparative approach was used to analyse interview and medical record data using Journal of advanced nursingDidn't put a label on it: Examining intimate partner strangulation within a diagnostic framework.PMC9922028K23AA027288K23 AA0272882017 Nursing Research GrantHolbrook DSCampbell JCSomoano FAAlexander KAPatch MKelen GAnderson JCfalseDidn't put a label on it: Examining intimate partner strangulation within a diagnostic framework.<h4>Aims</h4>The aim was to examine and describe women's emergency department visits and care-seeking experiences, including recognition, evaluation and communication of symptoms, injuries and health risks after non-fatal intimate partner strangulation.<h4>Design</h4>Using a diagnostic process framework, this mixed-methods study explores concordance and discordance of interview and medical records data to highlight opportunities for clinical diagnostic improvement.<h4>Methods</h4>In-depth, semi-structured interviews with women after an emergency department visit for non-fatal intimate partner strangulation, concurrent with medical records reviews, were conducted between March 2018 and January 2019. A constant comparative approach was used to analyse interview and medical record data using 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2023 Apr2025-04-04T09:19:03.969Z2025-04-04T09:19:03.969ZS-EPMC99220283586408310.1111/jan.15380