{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Ho T"],"funding":["AHRQ HHS"],"pagination":["e482-9"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9923615"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["136(2)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The use of unnecessary tests and treatments contributes to health care waste. The \"Choosing Wisely\" campaign charges medical societies with identifying such items. This report describes the identification of 5 tests and treatments in newborn medicine.<h4>Methods</h4>A national survey identified candidate tests and treatments. An expert panel of 51 individuals representing 28 perinatal care organizations narrowed the list over 3 rounds of a modified Delphi process. In the final round, the panel was provided with Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) literature summaries of the top 12 tests and treatments.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 1648 candidate tests and 1222 treatments were suggested by 1047 survey respondents. After 3 Delphi rounds, "],"journal":["Pediatrics"],"pubmed_title":["Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value."],"pmcid":["PMC9923615"],"funding_grant_id":["5T32HS000063-21","T32 HS000063"],"pubmed_authors":["Zupancic JA","Pursley DM","Ho T","Horbar JD","Goldmann DA","Dukhovny D"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Choosing Wisely in Newborn Medicine: Five Opportunities to Increase Value.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The use of unnecessary tests and treatments contributes to health care waste. The \"Choosing Wisely\" campaign charges medical societies with identifying such items. This report describes the identification of 5 tests and treatments in newborn medicine.<h4>Methods</h4>A national survey identified candidate tests and treatments. An expert panel of 51 individuals representing 28 perinatal care organizations narrowed the list over 3 rounds of a modified Delphi process. In the final round, the panel was provided with Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) literature summaries of the top 12 tests and treatments.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 1648 candidate tests and 1222 treatments were suggested by 1047 survey respondents. After 3 Delphi rounds, ","dates":{"release":"2015-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2015 Aug","modification":"2025-04-22T19:54:42.838Z","creation":"2025-04-06T02:57:45.181Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9923615","cross_references":{"pubmed":["26195536"],"doi":["10.1542/peds.2015-0737"]}}