<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>38(3)</volume><submitter>Pozo-Martin F</submitter><funding>Robert Koch-Institut</funding><pubmed_abstract>Contact tracing is a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) widely used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its effectiveness may depend on a number of factors including the proportion of contacts traced, delays in tracing, the mode of contact tracing (e.g. forward, backward or bidirectional contact training), the types of contacts who are traced (e.g. contacts of index cases or contacts of contacts of index cases), or the setting where contacts are traced (e.g. the household or the workplace). We performed a systematic review of the evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions. 78 studies were included in the review, 12 observational (ten ecological studies, one retrospective cohort study and one pre-post study with two patient cohorts) and 66 math</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of epidemiology</journal><pagination>243-266</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9932408</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9932408</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Diaconu V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pozo-Martin F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Bcheraoui C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beltran Sanchez MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muller SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weil K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.</name><description>Contact tracing is a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) widely used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its effectiveness may depend on a number of factors including the proportion of contacts traced, delays in tracing, the mode of contact tracing (e.g. forward, backward or bidirectional contact training), the types of contacts who are traced (e.g. contacts of index cases or contacts of contacts of index cases), or the setting where contacts are traced (e.g. the household or the workplace). We performed a systematic review of the evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions. 78 studies were included in the review, 12 observational (ten ecological studies, one retrospective cohort study and one pre-post study with two patient cohorts) and 66 math</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Mar</publication><modification>2025-05-29T19:43:33.753Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T19:43:33.753Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9932408</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36795349</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z</doi></cross_references></HashMap>