<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(2)</volume><submitter>Heeger CH</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The most frequent complication during CB-based PVI is right-sided phrenic nerve injury (PNI) which is leading to premature abortion of the freeze cycle. Here, we analysed reconnection rates after CB-based PVI and PNI in a large-scale population during repeat procedures.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>In the YETI registry, a total of 17 356 patients underwent CB-based PVI in 33 centres, and 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. A total of 111/731 (15.2%) patients received a repeat procedure for treatment of recurrent AF. In 94/111 (84.7%) patients data on repeat procedures were available. A total of 89/94 (94.7%) index pulmonary veins (PVs) have been isolated during the initial PVI. During repeat procedures, 22 (24.7%) of initially isolated index PVs showed reconnection. The use of a double stop technique did non influence the PV reconnection rate (P = 0.464). The time to PNI was 140.5 ± 45.1 s in patients with persistent PVI and 133.5 ± 53.8 s in patients with reconnection (P = 0.559). No differences were noted between the two populations in terms of CB temperature at the time of PNI (P = 0.362). The only parameter associated with isolation durability was CB temperature after 30 s of freezing. The PV reconnection did not influence the time to AF recurrence.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In patients with cryoballon application abortion due to PNI, a high rate of persistent PVI rate was found at repeat procedures. Our data may help to identify the optimal dosing protocol in CB-based PVI procedures.&lt;h4>Clinical trial registration&lt;/h4>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03645577?term=YETI&amp;cntry=DE&amp;draw=2&amp;rank=1 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03645577.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology</journal><pagination>374-381</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9935004</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Impact of cryoballoon application abortion due to phrenic nerve injury on reconnection rates: a YETI subgroup analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9935004</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kamioka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inaba O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tscholl V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Straube F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jedrzejczyk-Patej E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popescu SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chun JKR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Metzner A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pott A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scherr D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ehrlich JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aryana A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Battrawy I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Su W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Papiashvili G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gasperetti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steven D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aksu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saguner AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinek M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yalin K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sohns C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wissner E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heeger CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Urushida T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dahme T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Botros MSN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cay S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuniss M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makimoto H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aytemir K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuck KH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miyazaki S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyan E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sommer P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Proietti R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tilz RR</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Impact of cryoballoon application abortion due to phrenic nerve injury on reconnection rates: a YETI subgroup analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>Cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The most frequent complication during CB-based PVI is right-sided phrenic nerve injury (PNI) which is leading to premature abortion of the freeze cycle. Here, we analysed reconnection rates after CB-based PVI and PNI in a large-scale population during repeat procedures.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>In the YETI registry, a total of 17 356 patients underwent CB-based PVI in 33 centres, and 731 (4.2%) patients experienced PNI. A total of 111/731 (15.2%) patients received a repeat procedure for treatment of recurrent AF. In 94/111 (84.7%) patients data on repeat procedures were available. A total of 89/94 (94.7%) index pulmonary veins (PVs) have been isolated during the initial PVI. During repeat procedures, 22 (24.7%) of initially isolated index PVs showed reconnection. The use of a double stop technique did non influence the PV reconnection rate (P = 0.464). The time to PNI was 140.5 ± 45.1 s in patients with persistent PVI and 133.5 ± 53.8 s in patients with reconnection (P = 0.559). No differences were noted between the two populations in terms of CB temperature at the time of PNI (P = 0.362). The only parameter associated with isolation durability was CB temperature after 30 s of freezing. The PV reconnection did not influence the time to AF recurrence.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>In patients with cryoballon application abortion due to PNI, a high rate of persistent PVI rate was found at repeat procedures. Our data may help to identify the optimal dosing protocol in CB-based PVI procedures.&lt;h4>Clinical trial registration&lt;/h4>https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03645577?term=YETI&amp;cntry=DE&amp;draw=2&amp;rank=1 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03645577.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2024-11-12T07:26:19.529Z</modification><creation>2024-11-12T07:26:19.529Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9935004</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36414239</pubmed><doi>10.1093/europace/euac212</doi></cross_references></HashMap>