{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Nikl A"],"funding":["Corvinus University of Budapest","Ministry of Innovation and Technology in Hungary","New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology","János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences"],"pagination":["17"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9940337"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["21(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The EQ-5D-5L and 15D are generic preference-accompanied health status measures with similar dimensions. In this study, we aim to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.<h4>Methods</h4>In August 2021, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted in a representative adult general population sample (n = 1887). The EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values were compared in terms of ceiling and floor, informativity (Shannon's Evenness index), agreement, convergent and known-groups validity for 41 chronic physical and mental health conditions. Danish value sets were used to compute index values for both instruments. As a sensitivity analysis, index values were also estimated u"],"journal":["Health and quality of life outcomes"],"pubmed_title":["A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample."],"pmcid":["PMC9940337"],"funding_grant_id":["TKP2020-IKA-02","ÚNKP-22-5-CORVINUS-4","BO/00304/21"],"pubmed_authors":["Brodszky V","Janssen MF","Rencz F","Nikl A"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The EQ-5D-5L and 15D are generic preference-accompanied health status measures with similar dimensions. In this study, we aim to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.<h4>Methods</h4>In August 2021, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted in a representative adult general population sample (n = 1887). The EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values were compared in terms of ceiling and floor, informativity (Shannon's Evenness index), agreement, convergent and known-groups validity for 41 chronic physical and mental health conditions. Danish value sets were used to compute index values for both instruments. As a sensitivity analysis, index values were also estimated u","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Feb","modification":"2026-06-03T18:30:04.43Z","creation":"2025-04-06T10:12:44.974Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9940337","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36803866"],"doi":["10.1186/s12955-023-02096-z"]}}