<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Nikl A</submitter><funding>Corvinus University of Budapest</funding><funding>Ministry of Innovation and Technology in Hungary</funding><funding>New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology</funding><funding>János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences</funding><pagination>17</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9940337</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The EQ-5D-5L and 15D are generic preference-accompanied health status measures with similar dimensions. In this study, we aim to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In August 2021, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted in a representative adult general population sample (n = 1887). The EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values were compared in terms of ceiling and floor, informativity (Shannon's Evenness index), agreement, convergent and known-groups validity for 41 chronic physical and mental health conditions. Danish value sets were used to compute index values for both instruments. As a sensitivity analysis, index values were also estimated u</pubmed_abstract><journal>Health and quality of life outcomes</journal><pubmed_title>A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9940337</pmcid><funding_grant_id>TKP2020-IKA-02</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ÚNKP-22-5-CORVINUS-4</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BO/00304/21</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Brodszky V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janssen MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rencz F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nikl A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The EQ-5D-5L and 15D are generic preference-accompanied health status measures with similar dimensions. In this study, we aim to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values in a general population sample.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In August 2021, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted in a representative adult general population sample (n = 1887). The EQ-5D-5L and 15D descriptive systems and index values were compared in terms of ceiling and floor, informativity (Shannon's Evenness index), agreement, convergent and known-groups validity for 41 chronic physical and mental health conditions. Danish value sets were used to compute index values for both instruments. As a sensitivity analysis, index values were also estimated u</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-03T18:30:04.43Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T10:12:44.974Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9940337</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36803866</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12955-023-02096-z</doi></cross_references></HashMap>