{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"submitter":["Sii SSZ"],"funding":["National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Amblyopia is an important public health concern. While home-based screening may present an effective solution, this has not been rigorously assessed in a systematic review. A systematic review was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of home-based screening tools for amblyopia among children were included. Studies involving orthoptist or ophthalmologist-led screening and adult subjects were excluded. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic accuracy expressed as sensitivity and specificity. Among 3670 studies identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review. The age range of patients were less than 1 month to 16 years old. 7 studies used"],"journal":["Eye (London, England)"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9951845"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review."],"pmcid":["PMC9951845"],"funding_grant_id":["CL-2017-11-003","NIHR300155"],"pubmed_authors":["Kuht H","Sii SSZ","Thomas MG","Chean CS","Rufai SR","Bunce C"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review.","description":"Amblyopia is an important public health concern. While home-based screening may present an effective solution, this has not been rigorously assessed in a systematic review. A systematic review was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Clinicaltrials.gov. All studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of home-based screening tools for amblyopia among children were included. Studies involving orthoptist or ophthalmologist-led screening and adult subjects were excluded. The main outcome measure was the diagnostic accuracy expressed as sensitivity and specificity. Among 3670 studies identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review. The age range of patients were less than 1 month to 16 years old. 7 studies used","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Feb","modification":"2025-05-29T19:44:09.82Z","creation":"2025-04-19T16:28:59.776Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9951845","cross_references":{"pubmed":["36828959"],"doi":["10.1038/s41433-023-02412-3"]}}