<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Zou H</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Accurately predicting length of stay (LOS) is considered a challenging task for health care systems globally. In previous studies on LOS range prediction, researchers commonly pre-classified the LOS ranges, which were the same for all patients in the same classification, and then utilized a classifier for prediction. In this study, we innovatively aimed to predict the specific LOS range for each patient (the LOS range was different for each patient).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In the modified deep neural network (DNN), the overall sample error (root mean square error (RMSE) method), the estimated sample error (ERR&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub> method), the probability distribution with different loss functions (Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss1, Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss2, and Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss3 method), and the generative adversarial networks (WGAN-GP for LOS method) are used for LOS range prediction. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database is used to validate these methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The RMSE method is convenient for LOS range prediction, but the predicted ranges are all consistent in the same batch of samples. The ERR&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub> method can achieve better prediction results in samples with low errors. However, the prediction effect is worse in samples with larger errors. The Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss1 method encounters a training instability problem. The Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss2 and Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss3 methods perform well in making predictions. Although WGAN-GP for LOS method does not show a substantial advantage over other methods, this method might have the potential to improve the predictive performance.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The results show that it is possible to achieve an acceptable accurate LOS range prediction through a reasonable model design, which may help physicians in the clinic.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Heliyon</journal><pagination>e13573</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9958433</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Predicting length of stay ranges by using novel deep neural networks.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9958433</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zou H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tang L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Predicting length of stay ranges by using novel deep neural networks.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and aims&lt;/h4>Accurately predicting length of stay (LOS) is considered a challenging task for health care systems globally. In previous studies on LOS range prediction, researchers commonly pre-classified the LOS ranges, which were the same for all patients in the same classification, and then utilized a classifier for prediction. In this study, we innovatively aimed to predict the specific LOS range for each patient (the LOS range was different for each patient).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In the modified deep neural network (DNN), the overall sample error (root mean square error (RMSE) method), the estimated sample error (ERR&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub> method), the probability distribution with different loss functions (Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss1, Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss2, and Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss3 method), and the generative adversarial networks (WGAN-GP for LOS method) are used for LOS range prediction. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database is used to validate these methods.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The RMSE method is convenient for LOS range prediction, but the predicted ranges are all consistent in the same batch of samples. The ERR&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub> method can achieve better prediction results in samples with low errors. However, the prediction effect is worse in samples with larger errors. The Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss1 method encounters a training instability problem. The Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss2 and Dis&lt;sub>pred&lt;/sub>_Loss3 methods perform well in making predictions. Although WGAN-GP for LOS method does not show a substantial advantage over other methods, this method might have the potential to improve the predictive performance.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The results show that it is possible to achieve an acceptable accurate LOS range prediction through a reasonable model design, which may help physicians in the clinic.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T09:45:51.959Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T23:08:58.061Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9958433</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36852025</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13573</doi></cross_references></HashMap>