<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Bartosh AV</submitter><funding>Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation</funding><funding>Russian Science Foundation</funding><pagination>333</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9965744</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Changes in the limits of detection (LODs) for a multiplex lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) caused by different locations of the binding zone on the test strips were studied. Due to the non-equilibrium conditions of the immune reactions in LFIAs, their analytical parameters are susceptible to the binding constants of antigen-antibody reactions and assay duration. Consequently, the integration of several tests into one multiplex assay can cause a significant worsening of the sensitivity. In this study, we propose a simple methodology for the determination of the best arrangement of binding zones, which takes into account the binding constants for immunoreagents. LFIAs of four mycotoxins, namely, aflatoxin B1, deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin, and ochratoxin A, were integrated into a multiplex test strip. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was applied to determine the equilibrium and kinetic constants of the immunoreactants for each analyte. It was found that the arrangement of binding zones with a descending order of the equilibrium association constants was optimal and provided both lower detection limits and a more uniform coloration. The selected position of the binding zones allowed decreasing the LODs down to 2 and 27 times for ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol, respectively. The proposed approach can be applied to multiplex LFIAs for different analytes.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Micromachines</journal><pubmed_title>Handling Detection Limits of Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassay by Choosing the Order of Binding Zones.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9965744</pmcid><funding_grant_id>19-14-00370</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dzantiev BB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartosh AV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sotnikov DV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zherdev AV</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Handling Detection Limits of Multiplex Lateral Flow Immunoassay by Choosing the Order of Binding Zones.</name><description>Changes in the limits of detection (LODs) for a multiplex lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) caused by different locations of the binding zone on the test strips were studied. Due to the non-equilibrium conditions of the immune reactions in LFIAs, their analytical parameters are susceptible to the binding constants of antigen-antibody reactions and assay duration. Consequently, the integration of several tests into one multiplex assay can cause a significant worsening of the sensitivity. In this study, we propose a simple methodology for the determination of the best arrangement of binding zones, which takes into account the binding constants for immunoreagents. LFIAs of four mycotoxins, namely, aflatoxin B1, deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin, and ochratoxin A, were integrated into a multiplex test strip. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was applied to determine the equilibrium and kinetic constants of the immunoreactants for each analyte. It was found that the arrangement of binding zones with a descending order of the equilibrium association constants was optimal and provided both lower detection limits and a more uniform coloration. The selected position of the binding zones allowed decreasing the LODs down to 2 and 27 times for ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol, respectively. The proposed approach can be applied to multiplex LFIAs for different analytes.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-19T07:38:16.57Z</modification><creation>2025-02-18T23:57:50.102Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9965744</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36838034</pubmed><doi>10.3390/mi14020333</doi></cross_references></HashMap>