<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Wang XH</submitter><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><funding>Chen Xiao-Ping Science and Technology Development Fund</funding><pagination>e1214</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9975463</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>13(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Targeted therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered a promising treatment for primary advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the difference between synchronous and asynchronous treatment of lenvatinib with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in advanced HCC is still unclear. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor on the advanced HCC beyond oligometastasis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, 213 patients from four institutions in China were involved. Patients were split into two collections: (1) lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor were used synchronously (synchronous treatment group); (2) patients in asynchronous treatment group received PD-1 inhibitor after 3 months of lenvatinib treatment prior to tumour progression. To analyse progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy and safety of patients in both groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The 6-, 12- and 24-month OS rates were 100%, 93.4% and 58.1% in the synchronous treatment group and 100%, 71.5% and 25.3% in the asynchronous treatment group, respectively. In contrast to the asynchronous treatment group, the group treated synchronously exhibited a substantially enhanced OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.66; p &lt; .001). The 6-, 12- and 18-month PFS rates were 82.6%, 42.6% and 10.8% in the synchronous treatment group and 63.3%, 14.2% and 0% in the asynchronous treatment group, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the PFS rate (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.63; p &lt; .001) between the two collections.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Patients with advanced HCC beyond oligometastasis, simultaneous administration of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor led to significant improvements in survival.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical and translational medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Effectiveness of lenvatinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in primary advanced hepatocellular carcinoma beyond oligometastasis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9975463</pmcid><funding_grant_id>CXPJJH1200009-06</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>81873920</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jiao YQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duan XH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mao XH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou QF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang XH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wen HQ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Effectiveness of lenvatinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in primary advanced hepatocellular carcinoma beyond oligometastasis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Targeted therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is considered a promising treatment for primary advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the difference between synchronous and asynchronous treatment of lenvatinib with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in advanced HCC is still unclear. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor on the advanced HCC beyond oligometastasis.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this study, 213 patients from four institutions in China were involved. Patients were split into two collections: (1) lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor were used synchronously (synchronous treatment group); (2) patients in asynchronous treatment group received PD-1 inhibitor after 3 months of lenvatinib treatment prior to tumour progression. To analyse progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), efficacy and safety of patients in both groups, we employed propensity score matching (PSM).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The 6-, 12- and 24-month OS rates were 100%, 93.4% and 58.1% in the synchronous treatment group and 100%, 71.5% and 25.3% in the asynchronous treatment group, respectively. In contrast to the asynchronous treatment group, the group treated synchronously exhibited a substantially enhanced OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.66; p &lt; .001). The 6-, 12- and 18-month PFS rates were 82.6%, 42.6% and 10.8% in the synchronous treatment group and 63.3%, 14.2% and 0% in the asynchronous treatment group, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the PFS rate (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.63; p &lt; .001) between the two collections.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Patients with advanced HCC beyond oligometastasis, simultaneous administration of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor led to significant improvements in survival.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-03T17:10:35.235Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T21:54:58.657Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9975463</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36855781</pubmed><doi>10.1002/ctm2.1214</doi></cross_references></HashMap>