<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>102(3)</volume><submitter>Kamijo K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a possible cure for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) through potentially beneficial graft versus lymphoma effects. However, allogeneic HCT is associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Fludarabine with reduced-intensity busulfan (Flu/Bu2) and myeloablative busulfan (Flu/Bu4) are commonly used in conditioning regimens for allogeneic HCT; however, data on their use in patients with NHL is limited. We investigated the effect of busulfan dose on outcomes by comparing Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 in patients with NHL who underwent allogeneic HCT. Our study included 415 adult patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 (315 patients) or Flu/Bu4 (100 patients) between January 2008 and December 2019. All patients were enrolled in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors that may influence outcomes, we performed propensity score matching. The 5-year OS was 50.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.4%-60.8%) and 32.2% (95% CI, 22.4-42.4%) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 groups, respectively (p = 0.006). The hazard ratio comparing the two groups was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.30-3.50; p = 0.003). Both groups had a similar 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (38.2% vs 41.3%; p = 0.581), and the Flu/Bu4 group had a higher cumulative incidence of 5-year NRM (15.7% vs 31.9%; p = 0.043). In this study, Flu/Bu4 was associated with worse OS compared with Flu/Bu2 because of high NRM in patients with NHL.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of hematology</journal><pagination>651-661</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9977852</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Fludarabine plus reduced-intensity busulfan versus fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9977852</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kim SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kondo E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shimomura Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsuoka KI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kusumoto S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ashida T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakazawa H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kanaya M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maseki N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fukuda T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamijo K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ara T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuriyama T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mizuno S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Onizuka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shinohara A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atsuta Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Usui Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mizuno I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamaguchi M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Fludarabine plus reduced-intensity busulfan versus fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.</name><description>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a possible cure for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) through potentially beneficial graft versus lymphoma effects. However, allogeneic HCT is associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Fludarabine with reduced-intensity busulfan (Flu/Bu2) and myeloablative busulfan (Flu/Bu4) are commonly used in conditioning regimens for allogeneic HCT; however, data on their use in patients with NHL is limited. We investigated the effect of busulfan dose on outcomes by comparing Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 in patients with NHL who underwent allogeneic HCT. Our study included 415 adult patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 (315 patients) or Flu/Bu4 (100 patients) between January 2008 and December 2019. All patients were enrolled in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors that may influence outcomes, we performed propensity score matching. The 5-year OS was 50.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.4%-60.8%) and 32.2% (95% CI, 22.4-42.4%) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 groups, respectively (p = 0.006). The hazard ratio comparing the two groups was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.30-3.50; p = 0.003). Both groups had a similar 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (38.2% vs 41.3%; p = 0.581), and the Flu/Bu4 group had a higher cumulative incidence of 5-year NRM (15.7% vs 31.9%; p = 0.043). In this study, Flu/Bu4 was associated with worse OS compared with Flu/Bu2 because of high NRM in patients with NHL.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-19T09:20:19.159Z</modification><creation>2025-04-19T09:20:19.159Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9977852</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36631705</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00277-023-05084-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>