<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lewis CC</submitter><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><pagination>2633489521994197</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9978609</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite their inclusion in Rogers' seminal diffusion of innovations theory, few implementation studies empirically evaluate the role of intervention characteristics. Now, with growing evidence on the role of adaptation in implementation, high-quality measures of characteristics such as adaptability, trialability, and complexity are needed. Only two systematic reviews of implementation measures captured those related to the intervention or innovation and their assessment of psychometric properties was limited. This manuscript reports on the results of eight systematic reviews of measures of intervention characteristics with nuanced data regarding a broad range of psychometric properties.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The systematic review proceeded in three phases. Phase I, data collect</pubmed_abstract><journal>Implementation research and practice</journal><pubmed_title>Determining the influence of intervention characteristics on implementation success requires reliable and valid measures: Results from a systematic review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9978609</pmcid><funding_grant_id>1R01MH106510</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH106510</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Lewis CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyon AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mettert K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Determining the influence of intervention characteristics on implementation success requires reliable and valid measures: Results from a systematic review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Despite their inclusion in Rogers' seminal diffusion of innovations theory, few implementation studies empirically evaluate the role of intervention characteristics. Now, with growing evidence on the role of adaptation in implementation, high-quality measures of characteristics such as adaptability, trialability, and complexity are needed. Only two systematic reviews of implementation measures captured those related to the intervention or innovation and their assessment of psychometric properties was limited. This manuscript reports on the results of eight systematic reviews of measures of intervention characteristics with nuanced data regarding a broad range of psychometric properties.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The systematic review proceeded in three phases. Phase I, data collect</description><dates><release>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2021 Jan-Dec</publication><modification>2026-03-16T01:45:02.706Z</modification><creation>2025-08-15T03:05:47.084Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9978609</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37090003</pubmed><doi>10.1177/2633489521994197</doi></cross_references></HashMap>