<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>36(2)</volume><submitter>Beran A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations were found to be highly effective in phase 3 clinical trials. However, these trials have not reported data regarding the subgroup of liver disease or excluded patients with liver disease. The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among liver cirrhosis (LC) patients is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to include all the relevant studies that compared the outcomes of LC patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines vs. unvaccinated patients. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. Four studies with 51,834 LC patients (20,689 patients received at least one dose vs 31,145 were unvaccinated) were included. COVID-19-related complications, including hospitalization (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.004), mortality (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.55, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.0001), and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.77, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.01), were significantly lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients reduced COVID-19-related mortality, intubation, and hospitalization. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is highly effective in LC. Further prospective studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, are necessary to validate our findings and determine which vaccine is superior in patients with LC.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)</journal><pagination>151-156</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9980592</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 51,834 patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9980592</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mhanna M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohamed MFH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abuhelwa Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beran A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mhanna A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sayeh W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassouneh R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Musallam R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Assaly R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdeljawad K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 51,834 patients.</name><description>SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations were found to be highly effective in phase 3 clinical trials. However, these trials have not reported data regarding the subgroup of liver disease or excluded patients with liver disease. The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among liver cirrhosis (LC) patients is unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to include all the relevant studies that compared the outcomes of LC patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines vs. unvaccinated patients. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel method within a random-effect model. Four studies with 51,834 LC patients (20,689 patients received at least one dose vs 31,145 were unvaccinated) were included. COVID-19-related complications, including hospitalization (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.004), mortality (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.55, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.0001), and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.77, &lt;i>P&lt;/i> = 0.01), were significantly lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in LC patients reduced COVID-19-related mortality, intubation, and hospitalization. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is highly effective in LC. Further prospective studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, are necessary to validate our findings and determine which vaccine is superior in patients with LC.</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023</publication><modification>2024-11-20T12:07:18.044Z</modification><creation>2024-11-20T12:07:18.044Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9980592</accession><cross_references><pubmed>36876272</pubmed><doi>10.1080/08998280.2023.2165344</doi></cross_references></HashMap>