{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["71(3)"],"submitter":["Joo JY"],"funding":["Gachon University"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>There is a limited understanding of pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.<h4>Purpose</h4>To review and synthesize qualitative studies on uninfected pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.<h4>Methods</h4>Five databases were searched for qualitative studies published between January 2020 and January 2023. This study used a thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence and was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Furthermore, this review was registered with PROSPERO and a quality appraisal was assessed.<h4>Results</h4>Nine published qualitative studies were included in this review. The studies were conducted in eight countries and included 3,709"],"journal":["Nursing outlook"],"pagination":["101964"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9998291"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Antenatal care experiences of uninfected pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review."],"pmcid":["PMC9998291"],"pubmed_authors":["Joo JY","Liu MF"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Antenatal care experiences of uninfected pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>There is a limited understanding of pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.<h4>Purpose</h4>To review and synthesize qualitative studies on uninfected pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.<h4>Methods</h4>Five databases were searched for qualitative studies published between January 2020 and January 2023. This study used a thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence and was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Furthermore, this review was registered with PROSPERO and a quality appraisal was assessed.<h4>Results</h4>Nine published qualitative studies were included in this review. The studies were conducted in eight countries and included 3,709","dates":{"release":"2023-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2023 Mar","modification":"2025-05-31T23:13:39.164Z","creation":"2025-04-05T11:56:41.57Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC9998291","cross_references":{"pubmed":["37003090"],"doi":["10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101964"]}}