<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>71(3)</volume><submitter>Joo JY</submitter><funding>Gachon University</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is a limited understanding of pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To review and synthesize qualitative studies on uninfected pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Five databases were searched for qualitative studies published between January 2020 and January 2023. This study used a thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence and was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Furthermore, this review was registered with PROSPERO and a quality appraisal was assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine published qualitative studies were included in this review. The studies were conducted in eight countries and included 3,709</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nursing outlook</journal><pagination>101964</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC9998291</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Antenatal care experiences of uninfected pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC9998291</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Joo JY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu MF</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Antenatal care experiences of uninfected pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative systematic review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is a limited understanding of pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>To review and synthesize qualitative studies on uninfected pregnant women's antenatal care experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Five databases were searched for qualitative studies published between January 2020 and January 2023. This study used a thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence and was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Furthermore, this review was registered with PROSPERO and a quality appraisal was assessed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine published qualitative studies were included in this review. The studies were conducted in eight countries and included 3,709</description><dates><release>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2023 Mar</publication><modification>2025-05-31T23:13:39.164Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T11:56:41.57Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC9998291</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37003090</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101964</doi></cross_references></HashMap>