<HashMap><database>biostudies-other</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14</volume><submitter>Krishna Kumar Tiwari</submitter><journal>Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research</journal><pagination>4213-4218</pagination><species>Homo sapiens</species><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/MODEL0911120001</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-other</repository><additional_accession>18594002</additional_accession><pubmed_authors>Krishna Kumar Tiwari</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nick Holford</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eléa Thibault-Greugny</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lucian Smith</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Tham2008 - PDmodel, Tumour shrinkage by gemcitabine and carboplatin</name><description>&lt;notes xmlns="http://www.sbml.org/sbml/level2/version4">      &lt;body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">     &lt;p>PURPOSE: This tumor response pharmacodynamic model aims to describe primary lesion shrinkage in non-small cell lung cancer over time and determine if concentration-based exposure metrics for gemcitabine or that of its metabolites,n2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine or gemcitabine triphosphate, are better than gemcitabine dose for prediction of individual response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gemcitabine was given thrice weekly on days 1 and 8 in combination with carboplatin, which was given only on day 1 of every cycle. Gemcitabine amount in the body and area under the concentration-time curves of plasma gemcitabine, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, and intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate in white cells were compared to determine which best describes tumor shrinkage over time. Tumor growth kinetics were described using a Gompertz-like model.RESULTS: The apparent half-life for the effect of gemcitabine was 7.67 weeks. The tumor turnover time constant was 21.8 week.cm. Baseline tumor size and gemcitabine amount in the body to attain 50% of tumor shrinkage were estimated to be 6.66 cm and 10,600 mg. There was no evidence of relapse during treatment.&lt;/p>  &lt;/body>    &lt;/notes></description><dates><release>2009-11-15T00:00:00Z</release><modification>2025-07-15T10:11:48.897Z</modification><creation>2025-03-29T10:05:19.338Z</creation></dates><accession>MODEL0911120001</accession><cross_references><biomodels___db>BIOMD0000000234</biomodels___db><pubmed>18594002</pubmed><mamo>MAMO_0000046</mamo><go>GO:0002357</go><doid>DOID:1324</doid><taxonomy>9606</taxonomy></cross_references></HashMap>